نعمت الله موسی پور، آمنه احمدی (1392). طراحی برنامه درسی تربیت معلم در ایران. دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران.
Al-Mutawa, N. A. (1997). Evaluation of EFL primary school teachers’competencies in
Kuwait. Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1) 38-52.
Amoosi, Y. (2017). A Written Assessment Framework for ProfessionalCompetence of
Farhangian University ELT Student-teachers. Unpublished M.A Thesis. TarbiatModares University, Tehran.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D.(2014). Introduction toresearch in
education. CengageLearning.
Aseltine, J. M., Faryniarz, J. O., &Rigazio-DiGilio, A. J. (2006).Supervision for
learning: a performance-based approach to teacher development and school improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Askari, S. (2018).A dynamic approach to prognostic evaluation of qualityperformance
in Iranian pre-service EFL teachers. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation. TarbiatModares University, Tehran
Barnett, M. (2006). Using a Web-based professional development system to support pre-
service teachers in examining authentic classroom practice. Journal of Technology and TeacherEducation, 14(4), 701-729.
Cameron, R., & Wilson, S. (1993). The practicum: Student-teacher perceptions of
teacher supervision styles. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 21(2), 155-167.
Cochran-smith, M. (2010). Foreword. In M. M., Kennedy (Ed.), Teacherassessment and
the quest for teacher quality: A handbook (pp. xiii-1). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: Howteacher
performance assessments can measure and improveteaching. Center for American Progress.
Danielson, C. (2011). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for
teaching. Association for Supervision and CurriculumDevelopment (ASCD).
Danielson, C.,& Marquez, E. (1998). A Collection of Performance Tasks and Rubrics:
High School Mathematics. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc.
Delandshere, G., &Arens, S. A. (2003). Examining the quality of evidence in preservice
teacher portfolios. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 57-73.
Freeman, D. (1989). Teacher training, development, and decision-making:A model of
teaching and related strategies for language teacher education., TESOL Quarterly, 23(1), 27-45.
Fullan, M. (2001).Leading in a culture of change. New York: Jossey-Bass.
Gasper, M. F., & Vieira, C. R., (2013).Plenattitude teacher evaluation for teacher
Effectiveness and well-being with neuro-linguistic programming. US-China Education Review, 3(1), 1-17.
Hashemain, M., &Azadi, G. (2014). EFL teachers’ understanding of the teaching
portion of INSET programs. RALs, 5(1), 61-76.
Hattie, J. (2012).Visible learning for teachers, maximizing impact on learning.London
and New York: Routledge.
Hodge, K. J., & Morgan, G. B., (2014). The stability of teacher performance and
effectiveness: Implications for policies concerning teacher evaluation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(95), 1-21.
Ingersoll, R. (2007). A comparative study of teacher preparation and qualifications in six
nations. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Isoré, M. (2009), Teacher evaluation: Current practices in OECDcountries and a
literature review, OECD Education WorkingPapers, No. 23, OECD Publishing.
Kariminia, A. &Salehizadeh, S. (2007). Communication strategies: English language
departments in Iran. IranianJournal of Language Studies, 1(4), 287-300.
Kyriacou, C. (2007). Essential teaching skills. London, England: NelsonThornes Ltd.
Miles, M. B., &Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: Asourcebook.
Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Miller, M., McDiarmid, G. M., & Luttrell-Montes, S. (2009). Partnering to prepare urban
mathand science teachers: Managing tensions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(7), 848-863.
Molaeenezhad, A., &Zekavatee, A. (2008). A comparative study of teacher education
curriculum in England, Japan, France, Malaysia and Iran. Educational Innovations Quarterly, 26(7), 35-62.
Murdoch, G. (2000). Introducing a teacher-supportive evaluation system. ELT Journal,
54, 54-64.
Musset, P. (2010) ‘Initial Teacher Education and Continuing Training Policies in
Comparative Perspective: Current Practices in OECD Countries and a Literature Review on Potential Effects’, OECD Working Paper No. 48, OECD Publishing.
Navidinia, H., Kiani, G. R., Akbari, R., &Ghaffar Samar, R. (2015). EFLteacher
performance evaluation in Iranian high schools: Examiningthe effectiveness of the status quo and setting the Groundwork fordeveloping an alternative model. The International Journal ofHumanities, 21(4), 27-53.
Norouzi, M. (2017).A Performance Assessment Scheme for ELT Graduates of
Farhangian University. Unpublished M.A Thesis. TarbiatModares University, Tehran.
Ofsted(2006).The annual report of her majesty’s chief inspector ofschools 2005/2006.
London: The Stationery Office.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Cultural Development (OECD). (2005).
Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. OECD Publishing.
Peacock, M.(2009). The evaluation of foreign-language-teacher education programs.
Language Teaching Research, 13 (3), 259–278.
Rajaeenia, M. (2017). Performance Assessment and Accreditation of EFL Student-
teachers’ Competence: A Case of Iranian Farhanghian Universities. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. TarbiatModares University, Tehran.
Reeves, D. B. (2004).Accountability for learning: How teachers andschool leaders can
take charge. Alexandria, VA: Association forSupervision and Curriculum Development.
Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005).Professional development for language
teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom:Reciprocal effects
of teacher behavior and student engagementacross the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85,571-581.
Skowron, J. (2001). Powerful lesson planning models: The art of 1,000decisions.
Arlington Heights, IL: Sky Light Training andPublishing.
Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (1990). Delphi questionnaires versus individual and group
interviews: A comparison case. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 37, 293-304.
)