Altenberg, B., & Tapper, B. (1998). The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners' written English. In S. Granger (Ed.),
Learner English on computer (pp. 80-93). London: Longman.
Appel, R., & Trofimovich, P. (2017). Transitional probability predicts native and non‐native use of formulaic sequences.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
27(1), 24-43.
Baker, W. (2011). Culture and identity through ELF in Asia: Fact of Fiction? In A. Cogo, A. Archibald, & J. Jenkins (Eds.),
Latest trends in ELF research (pp. 35-52). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
Bestgen, Y. (2017). Beyond single-word measures: L2 writing assessment, lexical richness and formulaic competence.
System,
69, 65-78.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., & Hirst, G. (2002). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2008). From empirical findings to pedagogical practice. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.),
Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 375-393). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Buerki, A. (2018). 1. Formulaic sequences: a drop in the ocean of constructions or something more significant? In
Formulaicity and Creativity in Language and Literature. Taylor & Francis.
Chen, W. Y. C. (2006). The use of conjunctive adverbials in the academic papers of advanced
Taiwanese EFL learners.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(1), 113-130.
Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2008). Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics, 29 (1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm022
Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: examples
from history and biology.
English for Specific Purposes,
23, 397-423.
Creswell, W. J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. USA: Sage Publication.new
Ellis, N. C. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused SLA: The implicit and explicit learning of constructions. In A. Tyler, K. Yiyoung, & M. Takada (Eds.),
Language in the context of use: Cognitive and discourse approaches to language (pp. 93-120). Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
Field, Y., & Yip, L. M. O. (1992). A comparison of internal conjunctive cohesion in the English essay writing of Cantonese speakers and native speakers of English.
RELC Journal,
23(1), 15-28.
Ford, C. E. & Thompson, S. A. (1986). Conditionals in discourse: A text-based
study from English. In E. Traugott, C. Ferguson, J. S. Reilly, & A. ter Meulen (Eds.),
Linking adverbials (pp. 353-372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howarth, P. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency.
Applied linguistics,
19(1), 24-44.
Hyland, K. (2008). Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 1-9.
Jalali, H. (2013). Lexical bundles in applied linguistics: Variations across postgraduate genres.
Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Translation Studies,
2(2), 1-29.
Jalilifar, A. (2008). Discourse markers in composition writings: The case of Iranian learners of English as a foreign language.
English Language Teaching, 1, 114-122.
Lei, L. (2012). Linking adverbials in academic writing on applied linguistics by Chinese
doctoral students.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(3), 267-275.
Milton, J., & Tsang, E. S. C. (1993). A corpus-based study of logical connectors in EFL students' writing: directions for future research. In R. Pemberton & E. S. C. Tsang (Eds.),
Studies in lexis (pp. 215-246). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Language Centre.
Myles, F., & Cordier, C. (2017). Formulaic sequence (FS) cannot be an umbrella term in SLA: Focusing on psycholinguistic FSs and their identification.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
39(1), 3-28.
Parvizi, N. (2011).
Identification of discipline-specific lexical bundles in education. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.
Rahimi, M. (2011). Discourse markers in argumentative and expository writing of Iranian EFL learners.
World Journal of English Language, 1, 68-78.
Schmitt, N. (2004). Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Valipoor, L. (2010).
A corpus-based study of words and bundles in chemistry research
articles. Unpublished thesis. University of Kashan.
Wang, Y. (2017). Lexical bundles in spoken academic ELF: Genre and disciplinary variation.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(2). 187-211.
Wang, Y. (2018). As Hill seems to suggest: Variability in formulaic sequences with an interpersonal function in L1 novice and expert academic writing.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 12-23.
Wood, D. (2006). Uses and functions of formulaic sequences in second language speech: An exploration of the foundations of fluency.
Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 13-33.
Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence and applications. London: Continuum.
Wray, A. (2017). Formulaic sequences as a regulatory mechanism for cognitive perturbations during the achievement of social goals.
Topics in cognitive science,
9(3), 569-587.
Zareva, A. (2011). And so that was it': linking adverbials in student academic presentations.
RELC Journal, 42(1), 5-15.
Zhang, Z. (2000). Cohesive features in the expository writing of undergraduates in two Chinese universities.
RELC Journal, 31(1), 61-95.
)