رابطه بین روان رنجوری و بیان شفاهی زبان آموزان ایرانی با رویکرد مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری

نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه زبانشناسی و زبانهای خارجی دانشگاه پیام نور

چکیده

چکیده
در این پژوهش، رابطه‌ی بین روان‌رنجوری به عنوان یکی از پنج بعد اصلی شخصیت و مولفه‌های تشکیل دهنده‌ی گفتار، شامل روانی و انسجام گفتار، تلفّظ، دقت دستوری و واژگان مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. به همین منظور، 257 دانشجوی ایرانی رشته های زبان انگلیسی و داوطلب آزمون آیلتس (IELTS) در یک مصاحبه‌ی سنجش و ارزشیابی عملکرد بیان شفاهی شرکت کردند و در ادامه‌ی آن به پرسشنامه عوامل پنجگانه‌ی شخصیتی گلدبرگ (1999) پاسخ دادند. نتایج مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری که تاثیرات غیر مستقیم استاندارد روان‌رنجوری بر مولفه‌های بیان شفاهی را نشان می داد، بیانگر این بود که روان‌رنجوری اثر منفی متوسط بر روانی و انسجام گفتار (بتا = 0.350-)، واژگان (بتا = 0.365-)، دقت دستوری (بتا = 0.345-)، و تلفّظ (بتا = 0.350-) دارد که در این میان بیشترین تاثیر منفی را بر واژگان می‌گذارد. نتایج مطالعه، مورد بحث و تاثیرات ضمنی آن بر آموزش زبان انگلیسی مورد بررسی قرار می گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Neuroticism and the oral performance of Iranian EFL learners: a structural equation modelling approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Imanian
  • Fatemeh Hemmati
Department of Linguistics and Foreign Languages, Payame Noor University
چکیده [English]

This study aimed to investigate the effects of neuroticism, as one of the big five personality factors, on oral performance and its components comprising cohesion and fluency, pronunciation, grammaticality, and lexical resources. To this end, 257 Iranian EFL students took an oral proficiency interview (OPI) and responded to a personality questionnaire including 50 items (Goldberg, 1992). The participants' oral performance was rated by two trained raters. The structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis, revealing the standardized non-direct effects of neuroticism on the components of speaking, showed that neuroticism had moderate and negative indirect effects on cohesion and fluency (Beta = -.351), lexical resources (Beta = - .365), grammaticality (Beta = -.354), and pronunciation (Beta = -.350). The results of the study are discussed and the pedagogical implications are provided for the EFL context.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Oral performance
  • oral performance components
  • neuroticism
  • Comprehension apprehension
  • structural equation modelling

جوکار، بهرام؛ البرز ی، بهر ام ( 1389 ). رابطه و یژگیها ی شخص یت با خلا قی ت هیجا نی و خلاقی ت
.110-89 :(1) شناختی، مطالعات روانشناختی، 6
دستجردی، رضا؛ فرزاد، و لی الله؛ کدیور، پرو ین ( 1390 ). نقش پنج عامل بزرگ شخص یت در پ یش بین ی
.133-126:(2) بهزیستی روانشناختی، مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بیرجند. 18
Aldao, A., McLaughlin, K., Hatzenbuehler, M., & Sheridand, M. (2014). The
relationship between rumination and affective, cognitive, and physiological
responses to stress in adolescents. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 5(3),
272–288.
Apple, M. (2011). The Big Five personality traits and foreign language speaking
confidence among Japanese EFL students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
Tample University, Japan.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and
developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bae, J., & Bachman, L. F. (2010). An Investigation of four writing traits and two tasks
across two languages. Language Testing, 27(2), 213-234.
738 پژوهش های زبانشناختی در زبان های خارجی، دورة 9، شمارة 3، پاییز 1398
Beatty, M., & Andriate, G. (2009). Communication apprehension and general anxiety in
the prediction of public speaking anxiety. Communication Quarterly, 33(3), 174-184.
Biedron, A. (2011). Personality factors as predictors of foreign language aptitude.
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching,1(4), 467-489.
Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability
and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.
Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters.
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476-506.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PIR)
and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL:
Psychological Assessment Resources.
Digman, J. M. (1996). The curious history of the Five-Factor Model. In J. S. Wiggins
(Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-20).
New York: The Guilford Press.
Dornyie, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship between
personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and
Individual Differences, 36, 1907–1920.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck
PersonalityQuestionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals
in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social
psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big Five factor
structure.Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. A. (1986). Foreign language classroom
anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132.
Kim, J. Y (2015). The effect of personality, situational factors, and communication
apprehension on a blended communication course. Indian Journal of Science and
Technology,8(1), 528–534.
Lim, B., & Ployhart, R. E. (2006). Assessing the convergent and discriminant validity of
Goldberg's International Personality Item Pool: A multitrait-multimethod
examination. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 29-54.
Magnusson, D., & Endler, N. S. (1977). Personality at the Crossroads: London:
Psychology Press.
رابطه بین روان رنجوری و بیان شفاهی زبا نآموزان ایرانی، با رویکرد مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری 739
McCrae, R. R.,& Costa, P. T. (1987).Validation of the five-factor model of personality
across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52,
81-90.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories:
Theoretical contexts for the five factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), the five factor
model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51-87), New York: Guilford
Press.
McCrae R. R., & Costa, P. (2005). Personality in adulthood, second edition: A fivefactor
theory perspective. The Guilford Press.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor model and its
applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner R. C. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on
cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44(2), 283-305.
Beatty, M., & Andriate, G. (2009) Communication apprehension and general anxiety in
the prediction of public speaking anxiety, Communication Quarterly, 33(3), 174-184
Ormel, J., Bastiaansen, A., Riese, H., Bos, E. H., Servaas, M., Ellenbogen, M.,
Rosmalen, J. G., & Aleman, A. (2013). The biological and psychological basis of
neuroticism: current status and future directions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral
Reviews, 37(1), 59–72.
Rahimi, R., & Ahangari, S. (2016). The relationship between Big Five personality traits
and the amount of speaking among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language and
Linguistics, 2(1), 9-16.
Reidy, J., & Richards, A. (1997). Anxiety and memory: A recall bias for threatening
words in high anxiety. Behavior Research and Therapy, 35(6), 531-542.
Robinson, M. D., & Tamir, M. (2005). Neuroticism as mental noise: a relation between
neuroticism and reaction time standard deviations. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 89(1), 107–114.
Robinson, D., Gabriel, N., & Katchan, O. (1994). Personality and individual differences.
Individual Differences,16(1), 143-157.
Munz, S. M. &, Colvin, J. (2018) Communication apprehension: Understanding
communication skills and cultural identity in the basic communication course. Basic
Communication Course Annual, 30(10), 172-199.
Tobias, S. (1979). Anxiety research in educational psychology. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 71, 573-582.
Thurstone, L. L. (1934). The vectors of the mind. Psychological Review, 41, 1-32.
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1992). Affect, personality, and social activity. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 1011-1025.
740 پژوهش های زبانشناختی در زبان های خارجی، دورة 9، شمارة 3، پاییز 1398
Watson. D., Clark, L. A., & Carey, G. (1988). Positive and negative affectivity and their
anxiety and depressive disorder. Journal of abnormal psychology, 97(3), 346-353.
Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and speaking English as second language. RELC Journal,
37(3), 308-328.
Young, D. J. (1991). Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: What does
language anxiety research suggest? The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 426-439.
Zonderman, A. B., Stone. S. V., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Age and neuroticism as risk
factors for the incidence of diagnoses of psychotic and neurotic disorders. Paper
presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association,
New Orleans.