رابطه بین روان رنجوری و بیان شفاهی زبان آموزان ایرانی با رویکرد مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی(عادی)

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

در این پژوهش، رابطه‌ی بین روان‌رنجوری به عنوان یکی از پنج بعد اصلی شخصیت و مولفه‌های تشکیل دهنده‌ی گفتار، شامل روانی و انسجام گفتار، تلفظ، دقت دستوری و واژگان مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. به‌همین منظور، 257 دانشجوی ایرانی رشته‌های زبان انگلیسی و داوطلب آزمون آیلتس (IELTS)در یک  مصاحبه‌ی سنجش و ارزشیابی عملکرد بیان شفاهی شرکت کردند و در ادامه‌ی آن به‌پرسشنامه عوامل پنجگانه‌ی شخصیتی گلدبرگ (1999) پاسخ دادند. نتایج مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری که تاثیرات غیر مستقیم استاندارد روان‌رنجوری بر مولفه‌های بیان شفاهی را نشان می‌داد، بیانگر این بود که روان‌رنجوری، اثر منفی متوسطی بر روانی و انسجام گفتار (بتا = 0.350-)،  واژگان (بتا = 0.365-)، دقت دستوری (بتا = 0.345-)، و تلفّظ (بتا = 0.350-) دارد که در این میان بیشترین تاثیر منفی را بر واژگان می‌گذارد. نتایج مطالعه مورد بحث و تاثیرات ضمنی آن بر آموزش زبان انگلیسی مورد بررسی قرار می‌گیرد. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Neuroticism and the oral performance of Iranian EFL learners: a structural equation modelling approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Imanian 1
  • Fatemeh Hemmati 2
1 Department of Linguistics and Foreign Languages, Payame Noor University
2 Department of Linguistics and Foreign Languages
چکیده [English]

This study aimed to investigate the effects of neuroticism, as one of the big five personality factors, on oral performance and its components comprising cohesion and fluency, pronunciation, grammaticality, and lexical resources. To this end, 257 Iranian EFL students took an oral proficiency interview (OPI) and responded to a personality questionnaire including 50 items (Goldberg, 1992). The participants' oral performance was rated by two trained raters. The structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis, revealing the standardized non-direct effects of neuroticism on the components of speaking, showed that neuroticism had moderate and negative indirect effects on cohesion and fluency (Beta = -.351), lexical resources (Beta = - .365), grammaticality (Beta = -.354), and pronunciation (Beta = -.350). The results of the study are discussed and the pedagogical implications are provided for the EFL context.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Oral performance
  • oral performance components
  • neuroticism
  • Comprehension apprehension
  • Structural Equation Modelling

مراجع

جوکار، بهرام؛ البرزی، بهرام (1389). رابطه ویژگیهای شخصیت با خلاقیت هیجانی و خلاقیت شناختی، مطالعات روانشناختی، 6 (1): 89-110.
دستجردی، رضا؛ فرزاد، ولی‌الله؛ کدیور، پروین (1390). نقش پنج عامل بزرگ شخصیت در پیش‌بینی بهزیستی روانشناختی، مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بیرجند.18 (2):126-133.
Aldao, A., McLaughlin, K., Hatzenbuehler, M., & Sheridand, M. (2014). The relationship between rumination and affective, cognitive, and physiological responses to stress in adolescents. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 5(3), 272–288.
Apple, M. (2011). The Big Five personality traits and foreign language speaking confidence among Japanese EFL students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tample University, Japan.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bae, J., & Bachman, L. F. (2010). An Investigation of four writing traits and two tasks across two languages. Language Testing, 27(2), 213-234.
Beatty, M., & Andriate, G. (2009). Communication apprehension and general anxiety in the prediction of public speaking anxiety. Communication Quarterly, 33(3), 174-184.
Biedron, A. (2011). Personality factors as predictors of foreign language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching,1(4), 467-489.
Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.
Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476-506.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Digman, J. M. (1996). The curious history of the Five-Factor Model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-20). New York: The Guilford Press.
Dornyie, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1907–1920.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck PersonalityQuestionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992).  The development of markers for the Big Five factor structure.Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. A. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132.
Kim, J. Y (2015). The effect of personality, situational factors, and communication apprehension on a blended communication course. Indian Journal of Science and Technology,8(1), 528–534.
Lim, B., & Ployhart, R. E. (2006). Assessing the convergent and discriminant validity of Goldberg's International Personality Item Pool: A multitrait-multimethod examination. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 29-54.
Magnusson, D., & Endler, N. S. (1977). Personality at the Crossroads: London: Psychology Press.
McCrae, R. R.,& Costa, P. T. (1987).Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), the five factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51-87), New York: Guilford Press.
McCrae R. R., & Costa, P. (2005). Personality in adulthood, second edition: A five-factor theory perspective. The Guilford Press.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner R. C. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44(2), 283-305.
Beatty, M., & Andriate, G. (2009) Communication apprehension and general anxiety in the prediction of public speaking anxiety, Communication Quarterly, 33(3), 174-184
Ormel, J., Bastiaansen, A., Riese, H., Bos, E. H., Servaas, M., Ellenbogen, M., Rosmalen, J. G., & Aleman, A. (2013). The biological and psychological basis of neuroticism: current status and future directions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(1), 59–72. 
Rahimi, R., & Ahangari, S. (2016). The relationship between Big Five personality traits and the amount of speaking among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(1), 9-16.
Reidy, J., & Richards, A. (1997). Anxiety and memory: A recall bias for threatening words in high anxiety. Behavior Research and Therapy, 35(6), 531-542.
Robinson, M. D., & Tamir, M. (2005). Neuroticism as mental noise: a relation between neuroticism and reaction time standard deviations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 107–114.
Robinson, D., Gabriel, N., & Katchan, O. (1994). Personality and individual differences. Individual Differences,16(1), 143-157.
Munz, S. M. &, Colvin, J. (2018) Communication apprehension: Understanding communication skills and cultural identity in the basic communication course. Basic Communication Course Annual, 30(10), 172-199.
Tobias, S. (1979). Anxiety research in educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 573-582.
Thurstone, L. L. (1934). The vectors of the mind. Psychological Review, 41, 1-32.
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1992).  Affect, personality, and social activity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 1011-1025.
Watson. D., Clark, L. A., & Carey, G. (1988). Positive and negative affectivity and their anxiety and depressive disorder. Journal of abnormal psychology, 97(3), 346-353.
Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and speaking English as second language. RELC Journal, 37(3), 308-328.
Young, D. J. (1991). Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: What does language anxiety research suggest? The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 426-439.
Zonderman, A. B., Stone. S. V., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Age and neuroticism as risk factors for the incidence of diagnoses of psychotic and neurotic disorders. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans.
پژوهشهای زبانشناختی در زبانهای خارجی
دوره 9، شماره 3
آذر 1398
صفحه 721-740

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار