Ableeva, R. (2008). The effects of dynamic assessment on L2 listening comprehension.
Language and Sociocultural Theory, 1(1), 53–82.
https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.v1i1.53
Ableeva, R., & Lantolf, J. P. (2011). Mediated dialogue and the microgenesis of second language listening comprehension.
Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 133–149.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.565107
Albrecht, J., & Pearson, P. D. (2020). Effective strategies for comprehending argumentative texts.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 589–601.
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000387
Asgari, L. (2024). The impact of teacher professional identity, knowledge and education on dynamic assessment processes in English language learning. Journal of Foreign Language Research. Advance online publication. 10.22059/jflr.2024.373917.1113
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment.
Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.
https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119
Cambridge Assessment English. (2024). B1 Preliminary (PET) practice tests. Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, L., Wu, S., Chen, M. C., & Lin, C. Y. (2023). Exploring the impact of argumentative text features on EFL learners' reading comprehension.
International Journal of English Language Teaching, 11(12), 251–264.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n12p251
Fani, T., & Rashtchi, M. (2015). Dynamic assessment of reading comprehension ability: Group or individualized. Education Journal, 4(6), 325–331.
Farahani, F., & Moghadam, F. S. A. (2020). The impact of the cumulative group dynamic assessment on the learning of congruent and non-congruent collocations among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 7(4), 21–36.
Farokhipour, S., Khoshsima, H., Sarani, A. and Ganji, M. (2020). Presenting and investigating the effect of a local model of dynamic assessment in diagnosing and removing learning difficulties of high school students in productive skills. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 10(1), 120-134. 10.22059/jflr.2019.273144.593
Ghafour, Z., & Rahimi, M. (2021). The lived experiences of Iranian EFL learners: A narrative inquiry.
Journal of English Language Teaching and Research, 12(1), 121–133.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v12n1p121
Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2022). Teaching reading to EFL learners: Text structures, strategies, and comprehension.
TESOL Quarterly, 56(3), 487–512.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3077
Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2021). Comprehension processes in reading.
Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 405–432.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050901
Kramsch, C. (2015).
The applied linguist: A journey through theory and practice. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746216
Kuhn, D. (2017).
The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571350
Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Sociocultural theory and L2: State of the art.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 67–109.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060037
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future.
Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49–74.
https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014).
Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813850
Lidz, C. S., & Elliott, J. G. (2000). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. Elsevier Science.
Miri, M., Alibakhshi, G., Kushki, A., & Bavarsad, P. S. (2017). Going beyond one-to-one mediation in zone of proximal development (ZPD): Concurrent and cumulative group dynamic assessment. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 1–24.
Mirzaei, A., Shakibaei, L., & Jafarpour, A. (2017). ZPD- based dynamic assessment and collaborative L2 vocabulary learning. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(1), 114–129.
Mohammadi, M., & Rezaei, P. (2025). AI-based scaffolding and dynamic assessment in Iranian EFL classrooms.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 68, 101334.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101334
Pasandi, S., Bagherzadeh Kasmani, M. & Ahangari, S. (2023). Microgenetic Analysis in an EFL Context: The Effects of Teacher and Peer Scaffolding on Reading Comprehension Pedagogy. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 13(1), 59-78. doi: 10.22059/jflr.2022.338520.935
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Springer.
Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom.
TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471–491.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00245.x
Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2010).
Dynamic assessment in second language acquisition: Constructing a sociocultural approach to assessment. John Benjamins.
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.25
Poehner, M. E., & Yu, L. (2022). Dynamic assessment of L2 writing: Exploring the potential of rubrics as mediation in diagnosing learner emerging abilities.
TESOL Quarterly, 56(4), 1191–1217.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3098
Popham, W. J. (2001). The truth about testing: An educator's call to action. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Rahimnia, R. (2016). A critical analysis of the English language teaching curriculum in Iran: A sociocultural perspective.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(10), 241–248.
https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.10p.241
Rassaei, E. (2023). Implementing mobile-mediated dynamic assessment for teaching request forms to EFL learners.
Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(3), 257–287.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1924901
Rezai, M., Jafari, Z., & Rostami, Z. (2023). The effects of group dynamic assessment and process-based instruction on EFL learners' metacognitive awareness and listening comprehension.
Language Testing in Asia, 14(2), 1–16.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00229-1
Safaei Asl, N., Ahangari, S., & Saeedi, M. (2021). The effect of concurrent and cumulative group dynamic assessment on homogeneous and heterogeneous EFL learners' auditory memory in listening tasks. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 14(28), 67–86.
Sanaeifar, S. H., & Divcolaii, M. S. (2019). Actualizing language learners' potentials through mediation: Cumulative vs concurrent group dynamic assessment and students' self-management of learning tasks.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(7), 802–809.
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0907.08
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2020). Disciplinary literacy: A focus on comprehension of complex texts.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1007–1021.
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000422
Smith, J., Johnson, K., & Williams, L. (2021). Limitations of static assessments in capturing dynamic reading comprehension.
Educational Assessment, 26(2), 335–350.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2021.1888692
Stiggins, R. J. (2005). Student-involved assessment for learning (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, H., & Xu, Z. (2024). Technology-enhanced mediation in dynamic assessment of argumentative reading. ReCALL, 36(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344024000123
Wertsch, J. V. (2008).
Mind as action. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195117530.001.0001
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.
Zhang, J., & Liu, Y. (2023). Investigating the role of dynamic assessment in enhancing EFL learners' reading comprehension.
Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 19(2), 68–85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2023.100123
