نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی(عادی)
نویسنده
گروه زبانهای خارجه، دانشکده علوم انسانی و هنر، دانشگاه حضرت معصومه (س)، قم، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Despite ample research on university entrance examinations, the vocabulary section of the M.A. entrance exam for English-related majors in Iran, which has long been criticized by both candidates and lecturers, has not been examined comprehensively and exclusively. The present study aimed to evaluate the vocabulary section of the exam in the past five years through an argument-based validation. The participants included 194 English-major undergraduate students, 24 M.A. students, 16 university professors, and six native speakers of English, who responded to the vocabulary section, a vocabulary size test as a criterion measure, and a questionnaire. The lexical items in the vocabulary sections were analyzed against general and specialized corpora as well as major word lists. To examine item characteristics, test validity, and reliability, the researcher employed item analysis procedures, criterion-related validation, and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), and the participants’ questionnaire responses were analyzed qualitatively. The results indicated that 49.1% of the words were not of appropriate frequency in the BNC and COCA corpora, and 61.1% had no or scant frequency in specialized corpora for English majors. The validity and reliability indices of the test were found to be 0.32 and 0.48, respectively. Many items suffered from problems of item difficulty (70% of the items), item discrimination (38%), and choice distribution (58%), and participants generally deemed the test as unsuitable for admitting M.A. students. Consequently, the use of the test as a criterion for M.A. student admissions was found neither justified nor defensible. Implications, limitations, and suggestions for further research are discussed.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)