تاثیر دوزبانگی و جنسیت بر استفاده از استراتژی‌های شنیدار و درک شنیداری زبان آموزان ایرانی

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی(عادی)

نویسندگان

1 استادیار آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه مراغه، مراغه، ایران

2 استادیار مطالعات ترجمه، دانشگاه مراغه، مراغه، ایران

چکیده

گوش دادن در ارتباطات روزانه و فرآیند آموزشی از اهمیت بسزایی برخوردار است. داشتن تسلط خوب به زبان دوم (L2) برای برقراری ارتباط موفق در زبان دوم ضروری است. علیرغم اهمیت آن، در فراگیری زبان دوم، تحقیق، تدریس و ارزیابی مورد توجه کمی قرار گرفته است. هدف ازاین مطالعه مقایسه عملکرد زبان آموزان دو زبانه و تک زبانه بین دو جنس از نظر درک شنیداری و استفاده از استراتژی‌های شنیداری است. علاوه بر این، مطالعه حاضر به بررسی ارتباط بین استراتژی‌های شنیداری و درک شنیداری زبان‌آموزان می‌پردازد. برای تحقق این منظور، 112 فراگیر تک زبانه (67 پسر و 45 دختر) و 120 فراگیر زبان های خارجی دو زبانه (61 پسر و 59 دختر) برای شرکت در مطالعه انتخاب شدند و پس از پر کردن پرسشنامه استراتژی‌های شنیداری، در آزمون درک مطلب شنیداری شرکت کردند. نتایج تجزیه و تحلیل داده های حاصل از پرسشنامه و آزمون درک مطلب با استفاده از آزمون تحلیل واریانس (ANOVA) و همبستگی پیرسون نشان داد که تفاوت معناداری بین فراگیران زبان تک زبانه و دوزبانه، به نفع گروه دوم، از نظر درک شنیداری و استراتژی‌های شنیداری وجود دارد. همچنین یافته‌ها حاکی از این بود که تأثیر جنسیت بر درک شنیداری واستفاده از استراتژی‌های شنیداری معنی دار نبود. در نهایت، همبستگی مثبت معناداری بین درک شنیداری و استفاده از استراتژی‌های شنیداری مشاهده شد. مطالعه ی فوق در بردارنده ی مفاهیم اساسی برای طراحان برنامه‌های درسی و تهیه کنندگان مواد درسی می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effects of bilingualism and gender on Iranian EFL learners’ listening comprehension and listening strategy use

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Poorebrahim 1
  • Nazanin Shadman 2
1 Assistant Professor in TEFL English Department University of Maragheh, Maragheh,
2 Assistant Professor in Translation Studies English Department University of Maragheh, Maragheh
چکیده [English]

Listening is of significant importance in daily communication and educational process. Having a good command of second language (L2) listening is required for successful communication in L2. In spite of its importance, it has received little attention in second language acquisition, research, teaching, and assessment. This study aims at comparing bilinguals and monolinguals across gender in terms of listening comprehension and listening strategy use. The correlation between listening strategies and listening comprehension was also explored. To this end, 112 monolinguals (67 males and 45 females) and 120 bilinguals (61 males and 59 females) were selected to participate in the study. They filled out a listening strategies use questionnaire (LSUQ) and then took a listening comprehension test (LCT). The results of data analysis using a series of ANOVAs as well as Pearson correlational analysis revealed that there was a significant difference between monolinguals and bilinguals, in favor of the latter group, in terms of listening comprehension and the use of listening strategies. Moreover, the effect of gender on listening comprehension and listening-strategy use was not significant. Finally, a significantly positive correlation was found between listening comprehension and listening strategy use. This research carries essential implications for syllabus designers and material developers.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • bilingualism
  • monolingualism
  • listening comprehension
  • listening strategies
  • gender

مراجع

References
Abedi, P., Keshmirshekan, M. H., & Namaziandost, E. (2019). The comparative effect of flipped classroom instruction versus traditional instruction on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ English composition writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 6(4), 43–56.
Afsharrad, M., & Sadeghi Benis, A. R. (2017). Differences between monolinguals and      bilinguals/males and females in English reading comprehension and reading strategy use. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(1), 34-51. doi:10.1080/13670050.2015.1037238.
Alfarwan, S. (2021) Tertiary level Saudi EFL learners’ reading strategies in relation to gender and proficiency. Reading Psychology, 42 (6), 577-605.
Ansyari, M.F., & Rahmi, H. (2016). A comparison between male and female students’ language learning strategies preference. Indonesian Journal of Integrated English Language Teaching, 2 (1), 71-87.
Bacon, S. M. (1992). The Relationship between Gender, Comprehension, Processing Strategies, Cognitive, and Affective Response in Foreign Language Listening. The Modern Language Journal, 76, 160-178.
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bozorgian, H., Muhammadpour, M. (2020). Metacognitive Intervention: High WMC learners’ listening performance and metacognitive awareness. Foreign Language Research Journal, 9(4), 1055-1084.
Chen, A. (2010). Effects of listening strategy training for EFL adult listeners. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 7(1), 135-169.
Cohen, A. D., & Dornyei, Z. (2002). Focus on the language learner: Motivation, styles and strategies. In N. Smitt (Ed.). An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 170–190). London: Arnold.
Dongyue, L. (2004). EFL proficiency, gender and language learning strategy use among a group of Chinese technological institute English majors. Arecls E-Journal, 1 (A5).
Fayyaz, W., & Kamal, A. (2014). Role of gender, age, and geographical locality in metacognitive listening skills of English as a foreign language. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 29(2), 265-276.
Gavora, P., Vaculíková, J., Kalenda, J., Kálmán, O., Gombos, P., Świgost, M., & Bontová, A. (2020). Comparing metacognitive reading strategies among University students from Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(7), 896–910.
Goh, C., & Yusnita, T. (2006).  Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60, 222-32.
Gorjian, B., & Mahmoudi, K. (2012). The role of bilingualism and monolingualism in listening comprehension of learning English as a foreign language. Advances in Asian Social Science, 1(4), 313-314.
Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2011). Exploring the relationship between listening development and strategy use. Language Teaching Research, 15, 435-456.
Green, J. & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261-297.
Grundy, J. G., & Timmer, K. (2017). Bilingualism and working memory capacity: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Second Language Research, 33, 325–340.
Gu, Y. (2002). Gender, academic major, and vocabulary learning strategies of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 33 (1), 35-54.
Hong-Nam, K., & Leavell, A. G. (2007). A comparative study of language learning strategy use in an EFL context: Monolingual Korean and bilingual Korean-Chinese university students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8 (1), 71-88.
Kassem, H. M. (2015). The relationship between listening strategies used by Egyptian EFL college sophomores and their listening comprehension and self-efficacy. English Language Teaching, 8(2),153-169.
Kaylani, C. (1996). The influence of gender and motivation on EFL learning strategy use in Jordan, in R. Oxford (Ed.). Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 75-88). University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
Kostic-Bobanovic, M., & Bobanovic, M. (2011). A comparative study of language learning strategies used by monolingual and bilingual EFL learners. Metodicki obzori, 6(3), 41-53.
Legac, V. (2007). Foreign-language anxiety and listening skill in Croatian monolingual and bilingual students of EFL. In J. Horvath, & M. Nikolov (Eds.), UPRT 2007: Empirical studies in English applied linguistics (pp. 217-243). Pécs: Lingua Csoport.
Milla, R., & Gutierrez-Mangado, M. J. (2019). Language learning strategy reported choice by bilingual children in CLIL: The effect of age, proficiency and gender in L3 learners of English. System, 87, 102165.
Okyar, H. (2021). Vocabulary learning strategies of Turkish EFL learners: A focus on gender. Journal of English Teaching, 7(1), 43-54.
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Oxford, R.L. (1989). The use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17 (2), pp. 235-247.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House/ Harper and Row.
Oxford, R (2011). Teaching & researching: Language learning strategies (applied linguistics in action). Pearson ESL, England.
Oxford R.L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 291-300.
Poorebrahim, F., Tahririan, M. H., & Azali, K. (2017). Bilingual and monolingual EFL learners’ use of writing metacognitive strategies and writing performance. Applied Research on English Language, 6(1), 1-22.
Raguenaud, V. (2009). Bilingual by choice: Raising kids in two (or more!) languages. Boston: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Rahimi, M., & Katal, M.  (2011). Metacognitive strategies awareness and success in learning English as a foreign language: An overview. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 73-8.
Ratiu, I., & Azuma, T. (2015). Working memory capacity: Is there a bilingual advantage? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 1–11.
Rianto, A. (2021). Examining gender differences in reading strategies, reading skills, and English proficiency of EFL University students. Cogent Education 8, 1993531.
Shabani, M. B., & Najafi-Sarem, S. (2009). The study of learning strategies used by male/female monolingual and bilingual speakers as EFL learners [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Ilam, Iran.
Sharpe, P. (2001). How to prepare for the TOEFL test: Test of English as a foreign language. Barrons.
Schroeder, S. R., & Marian, V. (2012). A bilingual advantage for episodic memory in older adults. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(5), 591-601.
Tercanlioglu, L. (2004). Exploring gender effect on adult foreign language learning strategies. Issues in educational research, 14(2), 181-193.
Tran, T.V. (1988). Gender differences in English language acculturation and learning strategies among Vietnamese adults aged 40 and over in the United States. Gender Roles, 19, 747-758.
Tuncer, U. (2009). How do monolingual and bilingual language learners differ in use of learning strategies while learning a foreign language? Evidences from Mersin university. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,1, 852-856.
Wharton, G. (2000). Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learners in Singapore. Language Learning, 50, 203-243
Yang, N. (2009). A study of metacognitive strategies employed by English listeners. International Education Studies, 2(4), 134-139.
Yu, Z. (2021). The effects of gender, educational level, and personality on online learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-17.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
پژوهشهای زبانشناختی در زبانهای خارجی
دوره 12، شماره 2
شهریور 1401
صفحه 74-91

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار