انواع بازخورد، انتقال معنا و انتقال ساختار در نگارش مشارکتی زبان انگلیسی در بستر تعاملات رایانه ای چند رسانه ای و متن-محور

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی(عادی)

نویسندگان

1 استادیار آموزش زبان انگلیسی، واحد کرج دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران

2 گروه آموزش و مترجمی زبان انگلیسی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران

چکیده

این پژوهش به بررسی درگیر شدن زبان آموزان در سه فرآیند انتخاب بازخورد، انتقال معنا و انتقال ساختار در نگارش مشارکتی رایانه ای در بستر تعاملات چندرسانه ای و متن-محور پرداخته است. به این منظور در مرحله نخست، نگارش مشارکتی 30 تن از زبان آموزان ایرانی به روش تجزیه و تحلیل محاوره ای در انتخاب انواع بازخورد (شناختی ، فراشناختی ، احساسی ، بازقالب ریزی و استنتاجی) در دو بستر تعاملات رایانه ای بررسی شد. نتایج تحلیل مجذور کای بر فراوانی بازخوردهای رمز گزاری شده در داستان واره های زبانی (LRE) نشان داد که در بستر تعاملات چندرسانه ای و متن-محور، درگیر شدن زبان آموزان با انواع مختلف بازخورد به هنگام نگارش مشارکتی بطور معنا داری متفاوت است. در مرحله بعد، به منظور بررسی داستان واره هایی که در آنها زبان آموزان به میزان بیشتری درگیر انتقال معنا و انتقال ساختار بودند، تجزیه و تحلیل محاوره ای در دو بستر تعاملات رایانه ای انجام شد. سپس زنجیره های نشانگر، محرک، پاسخ و واکنش در داستان واره ها به هنگام انتقال معنا و انتقال ساختار توسط زبان آموزان شمارش شد. نتایج تحلیل مجذور کای بر واحدهای کد گزاری شده انتقال معنا و انتقال ساختار، نشان دهنده تفاوت معنادار در قابلیت دو بستر نگارش مشارکتی برای درگیرکردن زبان آموزان در انتقال معنا و انتقال ساختار بود. نتایج این تحقیق به جنبه های متفاوت دو بستر تعاملات چندرسانه ای و متن-محور در تسهیل روند یادگیری مهارت نگارش تاکید کردند که شامل طیف وسیعی از فرایندهای تولید نوشتار در زبان آموزان می باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Feedback Types, Negotiation of Meaning, and Negotiation of Form in Multimodal and Text-based Computer-Mediated English Collaborative Writing

نویسندگان [English]

  • Natasha Pourdana 1
  • Zohre Mohamadi Zenouzagh 2
1 Assistant Professor of TEFL Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Iran
2 English Teaching and Translation Department, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

This study aimed at investigating students’ feedback preferences and negotiation of meaning and negotiation of form in multimodal and text-based computer-mediated modalities of collaborative writing. To this end, 30 Iranian EFL students’ collaborative writing performances were traced via conversation analysis technique to identify their feedback preferences (cognitive, metacognitive, affective, recast and elicited) in two computer-mediated modalities. The chi-square analysis on frequency counts of feedback in language related episodes (LRE) indicated that two computer-mediated modalities were significantly different in engaging students with different feedback types. Further conversation analysis of student’s collaborative writing performances in two modalities was conducted to trace LREs in which students negotiated meaning and form. Each indicator, trigger, response, reaction chain in LREs was counted either as meaning or form negotiation units, depending on the type of LREs in which students co-managed to repair and further improve their writing outcomes. The chi-square analysis on meaning and form negotiation units indicated that text-based and multimodal computer-mediated significantly differed in their potentials of engaging students with meaning negotiation and form negotiation in collaborative writing. The results implied that despite two modalities may facilitate collaborative writing in different ways, they prepare EFL learners for distinct individual composing processes and written outcomes.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Collaborative Writing
  • Feedback
  • Multimodal
  • Negotiation of Form
  • Negotiation of Meaning
  • Text-based
Abe, M. (2020). Interactional practices for online collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 100752.
Abedi, H., Fatemi Jahromi, S., Anani Sarab, M. (2020). Exploring the effect of matching cognitive learning style with focused written corrective feedback on English definite/indefinite article system learning. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 10(3), pp. 602-617.
Abtahi, M., Abadikhah, S., & Dehqan, M. (2020). The Influence of Computer-based and Collaborative Handwritten Peer Feedback on the Writing Performance of EFL Learners. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies7(3), 92-113.
Al Ajmi, A. A. S., & Ali, H. I. H. (2014). Collaborative writing in group assignments in an EFL/ESL classroom. English Linguistics Research, 3(2), pp.1-17.
Azkarai, A., & Kopinska, M. (2020). Young EFL learners and collaborative writing: A study on patterns of interaction, engagement in LREs, and task motivation. System, 94, 102338.
Bagheri, M., & Zenouzagh, Z. M. (2021). Comparative study of the effect of face-to-face and computer mediated conversation modalities on student engagement: speaking skill in focus. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1), pp. 1-23.
Bower, J., & Kawaguchi, S. (2011). Negotiation of meaning and corrective feedback in Japanese/English eTandem. Language Learning & Technology, 15(1), pp. 41-71.
Cancino, M., & Panes, J. (2021). The impact of Google Translate on L2 writing quality measures: evidence from chilean EFL high school learners. System, 98, 102464.
Cequeña, M. B. (2020). Correlations of self-perception in reading and in writing, reading and writing performance in web-mediated and conventional writing instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), pp. 1067-1083.
Chien, Y.C. (2011). Effects of computer-assisted language learning (CALL) instruction on the acquisition of passive grammatical forms by post-secondary English as a second language (ESL) students. University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida.  
Cho, M. (2018). Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task performance. System, 72, pp. 85-98.
Cunningham, K. J. (2019). Student perceptions and use of technology-mediated text and screencast feedback in ESL writing. Computers and Composition, 52, pp. 222-241.
Cunningham, K. J., & Link, S. (2021). Video and text feedback on ESL writing: Understanding attitude and negotiating relationships. Journal of second language writing, 52, 100792.
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3‐D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), pp. 10-32.
Dellatola, E., Daradoumis, T., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2020). Exploring students’ engagement within a collaborative inquiry-based language learning activity in a blended environment Emerging Technologies and Pedagogies in the Curriculum (pp. 355-375): Springer.
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), pp. 51-71.
Eltahir, M. E., Alsalhi, N. R., Al-Qatawneh, S., AlQudah, H. A., & Jaradat, M. (2021). The impact of game-based learning (GBL) on students’ motivation, engagement and academic performance on an Arabic language grammar course in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, pp. 1-28.
Ene, E., & Upton, T. A. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, pp. 1-13.
Engerer, V. P. (2020). Temporality revisited: Dynamicity issues in collaborative digital writing research. Education and Information Technologies, pp. 1-32.
Fan, Y., & Xu, J. (2020). Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100775.
Felipeto, S. C. S. (2019). Collaborative and individual writing in a classroom: an analysis of texts written by elementary school students. Alfa: Revista de Lingüística, 63(1), pp.141-161.
Freiermuth, M., & Jarrell, D. (2006). Willingness to communicate: can online chat help?. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), pp. 189-212.
Freiermuth, M. R. (2001). Native speakers or non-native speakers: Who has the floor? Online and face-to-face interaction in culturally mixed small groups. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(2), pp. 169-199.
Guo, Y., Xu, J., & Xu, X. (2020). An investigation into EFL learners’ motivational dynamics during a group communicative task: A classroom-based case study. System, 89, 102214.
Gutiérrez, X. (2008). What does metalinguistic activity in learners' interaction during a collaborative L2 writing task look like? The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), pp. 519-537.
Hong, J.C., Hsiao, H.S., Chen, P.H., Lu, C. C., Tai, K.H., & Tsai, C.R. (2021). Critical attitude and ability associated with students’ self-confidence and attitude toward “predict-observe-explain” online science inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 104172.
Hull, D. M., & Saxon, T. F. (2009). Negotiation of meaning and co-construction of knowledge: An experimental analysis of asynchronous online instruction. Computers & Education, 52(3), pp. 624-639.
Ismael, A. a., Bakar, N. A., & Latif, H. (2016). Collaborative blended learning writing environment: effects on efl students’ writing apprehension and writing performance. English Language Teaching, 9(6), pp. 229-241.
Killingback, C., Ahmed, O., & Williams, J. (2019). ‘It was all in your voice’-Tertiary student perceptions of alternative feedback modes (audio, video, podcast, and screencast): A qualitative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 72, pp. 32-39.
Kim, D., Lee, Y., Leite, W. L., & Huggins-Manley, A. C. (2020). Exploring student and teacher usage patterns associated with student attrition in an open educational resource-supported online learning platform. Computers & Education, 103961.
Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100450.
Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, pp.769-782.
Li, M., & Kim, D. (2016). One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, pp. 25-42.
Lin, G.Y. (2020). Scripts and mastery goal orientation in face-to-face versus computer-mediated collaborative learning: Influence on performance, affective and motivational outcomes, and social ability. Computers & Education, 143, 103961.
Liu, F., Du, J., Zhou, D. Q., & Huang, B. (2020). Exploiting the potential of peer feedback: The combined use of face-to-face feedback and e-feedback in doctoral writing groups. Assessing Writing, 100482.
Liu, H., & Song, X. (2020). Exploring “Flow” in young Chinese EFL learners’ online English learning activities. System, 96, 102425.
Lyster, R. (2015). Using form-focused tasks to integrate language across the immersion curriculum. System, 54, pp. 4-13.
Magnifico, A. M., Lammers, J. C., & Curwood, J. S. (2020). Developing methods to trace participation patterns across online writing. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, 100288.
Mao, S. S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating written corrective feedback:(Mis) alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, pp. 46-60.
Mayo, M. d. P. G., & Ibarrola, A. L. (2015). Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System, 54, pp. 40-54.
Mohamadi, Z., & Rahimpour, M. (2018). Task types and discursive features: mediating role of meta-talk in focus. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(1), pp.17-40.
Mohammadi, Z. (2017). Interactional complexity development, interactional demonstrators and interaction density in collaborative and e-collaborative writing modalities. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 36(2), pp.75-102.
Morris, F. (2005). Child-to-child interaction and corrective feedback in a computer mediated L2 class. Language Learning & Technology,9(1), pp. 29-45.
Nguyen, L. V. (2008). Computer mediated communication and foreign language education: Pedagogical features. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 5(12), pp. 23-44.
Pereira, J. (2010). Handbook of research on personal autonomy technologies and disability informatics: IGI Global.
Poole, A. (2005). The kinds of forms learners attend to during focus on form instruction: A description of an advanced ESL writing class. Asian EFL Journal, 7(3), pp. 58-92.
Pourdana, N., Nour, P., & Yousefi, F. (2021). Investigating metalinguistic written corrective feedback focused on EFL learners’ discourse markers accuracy in mobile-mediated context. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1), pp.1-18.
Rabiee, A., Nazarian, Z., & Gharibshaeyan, R. (2013). An explanation for internet use obstacles concerning e-learning in Iran. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), pp. 361-376.
Rassaei, E. (2019). Computer-mediated text-based and audio-based corrective feedback, perceptual style and L2 development. System, 82, pp. 97-110.
Rezaei, S. (2011). Corrective feedback in task-based grammar instruction. Saarbrücken, Germany: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
Salem, A. A. M. (2019). Learning in a sheltered online scaffolding environment (SOSE). Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), pp. 2503-2521.
Shen, B., Bai, B., & Xue, W. (2020). The effects of peer assessment on learner autonomy: An empirical study in a Chinese college English writing class. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100821.
Shin, D. S., Cimasko, T., & Yi, Y. (2020). Development of metalanguage for multimodal composing: A case study of an L2 writer’s design of multimedia texts. Journal of second language writing, 47, 100714.
Steel, C. H., & Levy, M. (2013). Language students and their technologies: Charting the evolution 2006-2011. ReCALL: the Journal of EUROCALL, 25(3), pp.306-320. 
Stockwell, G. (2007). A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. ReCALL, 19(2), pp. 105-120.
Stockwell, G. (2010). Effects of multimodality in computer-mediated communication tasks. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching With Technology, pp. 83-104.
Storch, N. (2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17(2), pp. 95-114.
Tai, H.-C., Lin, W.-C., & Yang, S. C. (2015). Exploring the effects of peer review and teachers' corrective feedback on EFL students' online writing performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(2), pp. 284-309.
Thorne, & Lantolf, J. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development: Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tian, L., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System, 91, 102224.
Tolosa, C., East, M., & Villers, H. (2013). Online Peer Feedback in Beginners’ Writing Tasks. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 43(1), pp.1-24.
Tudini, V. (2013). Form-focused social repertoires in an online language learning partnership. Journal of pragmatics, 50(1), pp. 187-202.
van der Zwaard, R., & Bannink, A. (2014). Video call or chat? Negotiation of meaning and issues of face in telecollaboration. System, 44, pp. 137-148.
Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied linguistics6(1), 71-90.
Vetter, A., & Chanier, T. (2006). Supporting oral production for professional purposes in synchronous communication with heterogenous learners. ReCALL, 18(1), pp. 5-23.
Vygotsky, L. (1987). Zone of proximal development. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, 5291, pp.157-169.
Wigham, C. R., & Chanier, T. (2015). Interactions between text chat and audio modalities for L2 communication and feedback in the synthetic world Second Life. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(3), pp. 260-283.
Wilske, S. (2015). Form and meaning in dialog-based computer-assisted language learning. (Doktors der Philosophie), Universit at des Saarlandes.  
Worajittiphon, K. (2012). Negotiation for meaning in synchronous EFL chat. Procedia Engineering, 32, pp. 1157-1162.
Yanguas, Í. (2010). Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), pp. 72-93.
Yu, S., Jiang, L., & Zhou, N. (2020). Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large scale study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100451.
Zeng, G., & Takatsuka, S. (2009). Text-based peer–peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context. System, 37(3), pp. 434-446.
Zenouzagh, Z. M. (2020). Syntactic complexity in individual, collaborative and E-collaborative EFL writing: mediating role of writing modality, L1 and sustained development in focus. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), pp.2939-2070.
Zhang, Y., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2019). Empowering the point: Pains and gains of a writer's traversals between print-based writing and multimodal composing. Linguistics and Education, 51, pp.1-11.
Zhang, Z., Liu, T., & Lee, C. B. (2021). Language learners’ enjoyment and emotion regulation in online collaborative learning. System, 98, 102478.