Adams, R., Nuevo, A., & Egi, T. (2011). Explicit and implicit feedback, modified output and SLA: Does explicit and implicit feedback promote learning learning and learner-learner interaction. Modern Language Journal, 95, 42–63.
Allwright, R.L. (1975). Problems in the study of the language teacher’s treatment of learner errors. In M.K. Burt, & H.C. Dulay (Eds.), New directions in second language learning, teaching and bilingual education (pp. 96–109). Selected papers from the Ninth Annual TESOL Convention, Los Angeles.
Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.
Cohen, J.W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nded). Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Doughty, C. (2001). The cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.),Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Egi, T. (2007). Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The roles of linguistic target, length, and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 511–537.
Ellis, R. (2001). Form-focused instruction and second language learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. English Language Teaching Journal, 63, 97-107.
Ellis, R. (2010). Epilogue. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 335–349.
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 281–318.
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339–368.
Fowler, W.S., & Coe, N. (1976). Nelson English language tests. Thomas Nelson Ltd.
Han, Z-H. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543–572.
Havranek , G., & Cesnik, H. (2001). Factors affecting the success of corrective feedback. EUROSLA Yearbook, 1, 99–122.
Ishida, M. (2004). Effect of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form-te i-(ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning, 54, 311–394.
Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1–36.
Jones, C., & Waller, D. (2011). If only it were true: the problem with the four conditionals. ELT Journal, 65, 24–32.
Li, S. (2010), The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365.
Loewen, S., & Philip, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536–556.
Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, an effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536-556.
Lyster, R. (2001). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 51 (Suppl. 1), 265–301.
Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432.
Lyster, R., & Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59, 453–498.
Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 321–341.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.
Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 450–430.
Nassaji, H. (2007). Elicitation and reformulation and their relationship with learner in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 57, 511–548.
Nassaji, H. (2009). Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning, 59, 411–452.
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126–145.
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms. London: Routledge Publication.
Norris , J., & Ortega, L. (2006). The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching . In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 3–52 ). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking recasts: A learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese classroom. In J.K. Hall & L. Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language through classroom interaction (pp. 47–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Plonsky, L. and Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “Big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /r/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62, 595–633.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language acquisition (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263–289.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255–283.
Sheen, Y. (2011). Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language learning. New York: Springer.
Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 593–610). New York: Routledge.
Sheen,Y. (2010). The role of oral and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32, 169–179.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 29, 1–15.
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.
Spada, N., Lightbown, P., & White, J. (2008). The importance of form/meaning mappings in explicit form-focused instruction. Investigations in Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 4, 171–206.
Trofimovich, R., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 171–195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, J. (2005). Form-focused instruction. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 673–691). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Yang, Y., & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on learners’acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 235–263.