A comparative study of augmentation processes in Persian and Japanese Languages Based on the Theory of Evaluative Morphology

Document Type : research article

Authors

1 University of Tehran

2 Faculty member in Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literatures University of Tehran

Abstract

The current study is aimed at analyzing and comparing augmentation processes in Persian and Japanese languages based on the theory of evaluative morphology. According to evaluative morphology, a linguistic construction is evaluative if it conveys (consciously or subconsciously) a type of value of the referents or audience, according to the speaker’s judgment. Morphology provides the speakers of a language with different means and ways for expression of evaluation in language and plays a dominant role in the formation of evaluatives. Diminutives and augmentatives are two main forms of evaluation in languages. As diminutives are much more common in languages and are generally formed by affixes specifically developed for this function, they are also investigated more pervasively than augmentatives. This is also true for Persian and Japanese linguistics where augmentatives, at least in the case of Persian, have so far been neglected or have only been sporadically touched upon in grammar books. The findings of this study showed that although Persian and Japanese belong to two different language families and are typologically placed in two different language types, both use compounding and reduplication as two dominant mechanisms for producing augmentatives. The present study aims to provide a detailed examination and comparison of these two mechanisms for the formation of augmentatives in two languages.

Keywords

References

Grandi, N. (2002). Development and spread of augmentative suffixes in the Mediterranean area. In P. Ramat & T. Stolz (Eds.), Mediterranean Languages (pp. 171-190). Bochum, Germany: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer University Press.
Grandi, N. (2005). Sardinian evaluative morphology in typological perspective. In I. Putzu (Ed.), Sardinian in typological perspective (pp. 188–209). Bochum, Germany: Brockmeyer University Press.
Grandi, N. (2017). Evaluatives in Morphology. [Online] Available: Oxfor Online publication.
Hunston, S. & Thompson, G. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ito, J. & Mester, A. (2015). Word formation and phonological processes. in Kubozono Haruo (Ed) The handbook of Japanese phonetics and phonology, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. 363-395.
Körtvélyessy, L. (2012). Evaluative morphology from cross-linguistic perspective. Paper presented at the Universals and Typology in Word-Formation II conference, Košice, 26–8.
Matissof, J. A. (1991). The mother of all morphemes: augmentatives and diminutives in areal and universal perspective. In Ratliff Martha & Schiller Eric (eds.), Papers from the first annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistic Society, Tempe, AZ, 1991: 293-349.
Miyake, Y. M. (1999). The Japanese deferential prefix o: A natural history (Doctoral dissertation), University of Michigan.
Scalise, S. (1984). Generative morphology. Dordecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
Scalise, S. (1986). Generative Morphology, 2nd edn, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
 
دبیرمقدم، محمد، ملکی، سیما (1395). تحلیل صوری و معنایی فرایند تکرار کامل در زبان فارسی. مجله زبان‌شناسی و گویش‌های خراسان، 8 (14)، 1-23.
دهخدا، علی­اکبر، لغت­نامه، تهران: مؤسسه لغت­نامه دهخدا.
شقاقی، ویدا (1386). مبانی صرف، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
صالحی، زهرا، داوری اردکانی، نگار (1392). مطالعة تطبیقی ضمایر شخصی در فارسی و ژاپنی. پژوهش­های زبان­شناختی در زبان­های خارجی، 3 (2)، 242-201.
Journal of Foreign Language Research
Volume 10, Issue 2
July 2020
Pages 434-447

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics