Analyzing Image Representation in Iranian English High School Textbooks: A Social Semiotic Perspective

Document Type : research article

Authors

English Department, Shahrekord University

Abstract

Given the vital role of images in conveying meanings in books, the current study analyzed the images of English high school textbooks (Prospect 1, Prospect 2, and Prospect 3) from an ontogenetic perspective. More specifically, It investigated the developmental changes of the representational mode in the images, both quantitatively and qualitatively, based on the Kress and van Leeuwen’s (2006) social semiotic framework. Results revealed that there was no relevant pattern in the image use in line with the semiotic framework, given high school students’ developmental growth. The analysis of three aspects of representational mode, including processes, participants, and settings, showed that changes from narrative to conceptual processes, specifics to generics, cartoons to photographs, and local to non-local settings did not exist in these three textbooks. The findings of the study can help English textbook writers increase their awareness and knowledge regarding the role of images in the students’ learning process.

Keywords

References

35.
Alimorad, Z. (2014).  Examining identity options in native and nonnative produced textbooks taught in Iran: A Critical textbook evaluation. RALs, 5(2), 95-112.
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2010). Changing text: A social semiotic analysis of textbooks. Design for Learning, 3, 10-29.
Callow, J. (2006). Images, politics and multiliteracies: Using a visual metalanguage. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 29(1), 7-23.
Christie, F. (2010). The ontogenesis of writing in childhood and adolescence. In D. Wyse, R. Andrews & J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of English, language, and literacy teaching (pp. 146-158). London: Routledge.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. South Yarra, Victoria: Macmillan Publishers Australia.
Jewitt, C., & Oyama, R. (2001). Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In T. van Leeuwen, & C. Jewitt (Eds.), A handbook of visual analysis (pp. 134-156). London: SAGE Publications.
Kasmaienezhadfard, S., & Pourrajab, M. (2015). Effects of pictures in textbooks on students’ creativity. Multi Disciplinary Edu Global Quest (Quarterly), 4(2). 83-96.
Kern, R. (2008). Literacy, technology, and language learning: Where we’ve been and where we’re headed. Retrieved May 2016 from World Wide Web: php.csumb.edu/wlc/ojs/index.php/ ds/article/viewArticle/25
Kia-Ahmadi, E., & Arabmofrad, A. (2015). An analysis of first grade junior high schools’ English textbooks in the light of multiple intelligence theory: The comparison between newly published “Prospect 1” and the old one “Right Path to English 2”. International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research, 4(2), 111-120.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1976). System and function in language. London: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1996). Literacy and linguistics: A functional perspective. In R.  Hasan, & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 339-376). London: Longman (reprinted in J. J. Webster (Eds.), The collected works of M.A.K. Halliday: Vol. 9. Language and education (pp. 97–132). London: Continuum.
Hibbing, A. N., & Rankin-Ericson, J. L. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand words: Using visual image to improve comprehension for middle school struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 56(8), 758-770.
Guo, N. S. (2015). The ontogenesis of multiliteracy scaffolding in textbooks: Multimodal analysis of English language teaching textbooks of different grades. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Guo, N. S., & Feng, D. (2015). Infusing multiliteracies into English language curriculum: The visual construction of knowledge in English textbooks from an ontogenetic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 31, 115-129.
Guo, N. S. (2015). Infusing multiliteracies into English language curriculum: The visual construction of knowledge in English textbooks from an ontogenetic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 31, 115-129.
Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315- 328.
Machin, D. (2004). Building the world’s visual language: The increasing global importance of image banks in corporate media. Visual Communication, 3, 316-336.
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Appliable discourse analysis. In Y. Fang, & J. J. Webster (Eds.), Developing systemic functional linguistics: Theory and application (pp. 138-208). London: Continuum.
Moghtadi, L. (2013). Visual elements used in Iran EFL high school textbooks. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research. 1(1), 45-56.
Moghtadi, L. (2014). Iranian High school EFL Textbooks: Why they should be modified. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 5(2), 53-69.
Nooreen N., & Arshad, A. A. (2010). Examining the importance of EST and ESL textbooks and materials: Objectives, content, and form. Retrieved January 2016 from: World Wide Web: http://www.esp-world.info/Articles_9/textbooks.htm
Nordensvärd, E. (2010). Multimodality: An EFL textbook comparison using multimodal discourse analysis. Retrieved February 2016 from World Wide Web:  http://sh.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:395278/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roohani, A., & Saeidfar, A. (2013). A critical evaluation of visual elements in Iranian junior high school English textbooks. Journal of Faculty of Letter and Humanities, 8(28), 80-96.
Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (1996). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomlinson, B. (Ed.) (2003). Developing materials for language teaching. London: Continuum.
Torres, G. (2015). ‘Reading’ world link: A visual social semiotic analysis of an EFL textbook. International Journal of English Language Education, 3, 239-253.
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. New York: Oxford University Press
Journal of Foreign Language Research
Volume 7, Issue 1
November 2017
Pages 99-128

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics