Phonological Explanation of Epenthetic [-n] in Qur'anic Arabic

Document Type : research article

Authors

1 Interdisciplinary Qur'anic Studies Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Linguistics, Humanities Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Epenthetic [-n] is one of the four types of singular nūn in Qur'anic Arabic. The present study aims to provide a phonological explanation based on Markedness Theory for the motivation of insertion, the reason of choosing as well as the role that this consonant plays in the existing structures. For this purpose, all the cases in which epenthetic [-n] is used were extracted computationally. Next, the lexical and syntactic categories of linguistic elements and the phonological context in which epenthesis occurs were determined. Then, an explanation for this process was presented based on various concepts such as sonority, syllable structure, perceptual clues etc. The findings show epenthesis has been primarily motivated by the desire to eliminate onsetless syllables and to resolve vowel hiatus. Due to this insertion the phenomenon of opacity occurs which prevents the vowel from undergoing vowel harmony. Furthermore, understanding the nasals’ exact place of articulation is difficult. By inserting this consonant, due to the auditory salience and acoustic clues, the perceived clarity of the place of articulation increases. Moreover, because there is an inverse relationship between the degree of nasal consonant salience and the degree of perception of the vowel nasality; the amount of prominence of the vowel that follows the nasal consonant is reduced. As a result, a less marked structure is created. Therefore, the insertion of this consonant is done with the aim of reducing markedness and is in line with the universal tendency of languages in relation to using less marked structures.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Almisreb, A. A, Abidin, A.F. & Tahir, N.M. (2016). An acoustic investigation of Arabic vowels pronounced by Malay speakers. Journal of King Saud University- Computer and Information Science, 28, 148-156.
Barth, J. (1972). Sprachwissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Semitischen. Amsterdam: Oriental Press.
Broselow, E. (2018). Syllable structure in the dialects of Arabic. In E. Benmamoun & R.  Bassiouney, The Rutledge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics (pp.11-32). London &New York: Rutledge.
Blevins, J. (2008). Consonant epenthesis: Natural and unnatural histories. In J. Good (Ed.), Language Universals and Language Change, (pp.79–107). New York: Oxford University Press.
Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In J.Kingston & M. E. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, (pp.283–333). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohn, A. (1990). Phonetic and phonological roles of nasalization. PhD Dissertation. Linguistics Department, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).
De Lasy, P. (2006). Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in Phonology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Delvaux, V., Demolin, D., Harmegnies, B., & Soquet, A. (2008). The aerodynamics of nasalization in French. Phonetics, 36 (4), 578–606.
Haspelmath, M. (2006). Against markedness and what to replace it with. Linguistics, 42, 25–70.
Hasselbach, R. (2006). The vntive/energic in Semitic: a morphological study. Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 156, 309–28.
Hansson, G. Ó. (2021). The role of consonants in vowel harmony. In N. Ritter & H.van der Hulst (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Vowel Harmony (pp. XXXX). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hetzron, R. (1969). The Third person singular pronoun suffixes in Proto-Semitic. Orientalia Suecana, 8, 101–27.
Holes, C. (2018). Arabic Historical Dialectology: Linguistic and Sociolinguistic Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hume, E. (1996). Coronal consonant, front vowel parallels in Maltese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 14 (1), 163-203.
 Hume, E. (1994). Vowels, Coronal Consonants and Their Interaction in Non-linear Phonology. New York: Gaarland.
Ibikunle, A.S., Bakre, N.O. & Adebayo, O.M. (2020). Consonant Insertion in Iyinno: A Critique. American International Journal of Education and Linguistics Research, 3 (1), 34-37.
Ito, J. (1989). Prosodic theory of epenthesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7(2), 159-217.
Jeong, S. (2012). Directional asymmetry in nasalization: a perceptual account. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 18(3), 437-469.
Kager, R. (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kang, Y. (2000). The Phonetics and Phonology of Coronal Markedness and Unmarkedness.Ph.D dissertation. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy. MIT.
Kawasaki, H. (1986). Phonetic explanation for phonological universals: the case of distinctive vowel nasalization. In J.J. Ohala & J.J. Jaeger (Eds.), Experimental Phonology (pp.81-103). Orlando:Academic Press.
Kiparsky, P. (1997). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry, 10 (3), 421–441.
Krämer, M. & Zec, D. (2020). Nasal consonants, sonority, and syllable phonotactics: the dual nasal hypothesis. Phonology, 37, 27-63.
Lombardi, L. (2002). Coronal epenthesis and markedness. Phonology, 19 (2), 219-251.
McCarthy, J. (2002). A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 McCarthy, J. (1988). Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica, 43, 84-108.
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. Beckman, L. Walsh Dickey, & S. Urbanczyk (Eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18 (pp. 249-384). Amherst, MA: GLSA.
McCarthy, J. & Taub, A. (1992). Review of C. Paradis and J.-F. Prunet, eds. (1991) The Special Status of Coronals.Phonology, 21, 363-70.
Morley, R. (2018). Is Phonological Consonant Epenthesis Possible? A Series of Artificial Grammar Learning Experiments.Phonology, 35 (4), 649-688.
Mortezaei, E. & Fooladi, T. (2021). The Calligraphy of Ottoman Quranic Manuscript in the Balance of Critique (Final Section). Rahavarde Noor, 74, 23-35. (In Persian)
Owens, J. (2013). The historical linguistics of the intrusive *- n in Arabic and West Semitic. American Oriental Society, 133 (2), 217-248.
Oyebade, F. (2004). A Course in Phonology.Ilorin: Belodan.
Paradis, C., & Prunet, J.F. (1991). Phonetics and Phonology: The Special Status of Coronals: Internal and External Evidence. San Diego: Academic Press.
Prince, A. & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA, & Oxford: Blackwell.
Razinejad, S.M. (2018). conspiracy for satisfying sonority sequence principle in Azarbaijani Turkish Language. Foreign Language Research, 8 (2), 585-602. (In Persian)
Retsö, Jan. (1988). Pronominal suffixes with –n (n) - in Arabic dialects and other Semitic languages. Zeitschrift für arabische Linguistik, 18, 77–94.
Rice, K. (2007). Markedness in phonology. In P. De Lacy (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology (pp.79-97) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rice, K. & Averry, P. (1991). On the relationship between laterality and coronality. In C. Paradise & J.F. Prunet (Eds.), The Special Statuse of Coronals (101-124). San Diego: Academic Press.
Roca, L. & Johnson, W. (1999). A Course in Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sabao, C. (2013). Feature conditioned resolution of hiatus in Chichewa.
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 31 (1), 25-38.
Safai, G. (2008). Translation and Description of Mughni al-Adib.Qom:Qods. Vol.3. (In Persian)
Selkirk, E.O. (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory. In M. Aronoff & R.T. Oehrle (Eds.), Language Sound Structure (pp.107-136). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Skaer, P. M. (2001). An introduction to the phonology of casual spoken English. Hiroshima University Faculty of Integrated Arts and Sciences Journal, 27, 1-25.
 Skaer, P. M. (2005). Evolution, structuralism, and Chomsky: An introduction to issues involving rules, constraints, and Universal Grammar in modern generative phonology. Hiroshima University Faculty of Integrated Arts and Sciences Journal, 31, 75-101.
Smith, J.L. (2007). Representational complexity in syllable structure and its consequences for Gen and Con. In S. Blaho, P. Bye & M. Kramer (Eds.), Freedom of Analysis (257-80). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Steriade, D. (2008). The phonology of perceptibility effects: the P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In K.Hanson &S. Inkelas (Eds.), The Nature of the Word  (151-179).Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Tajabadi, F. & Ghiyas Zareiyan, M. (2022). Linguistic Deviation of Ayah Endings from Ibn Sayegh’s Point of View: The Case of The First Fifteen Ajza' of the Qur’an.Literary- Quranic Researches, 9 (3), 79-104. (In Persian)
Testen, D. (1993). On the development of the energic suffixes. In M. Eid & C. Holes (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics V (pp.293–312). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Uffmann, C. (2007). Intrusive [r] and optimal epenthetic consonants. Languages Science, 29, 451-476.
Yan-qiu, Z., & TIAN Feng-juan, T. (2015). Study on Markedness in Linguistics. Sino-US English Teaching, 12 (9), 667-671.  
Żygis, M. (2010). Typology of consonantal insertions. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 52, 111 – 140.
 
Journal of Foreign Language Research
Volume 13, Issue 2
July 2023
Pages 245-266

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics