A comparative structural move analysis of topical and biographical Encyclopedia articles

Document Type : research article

Author

Iran Encyclopedia Compiling Foundation

Abstract

The present paper reports on an empirical study that involved the structural move analysis of encyclopedic genre. For purposes of the current study, a corpus of 240 encyclopedic entries (120 topical entries and 120 biographical entries) were randomly chosen from Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of Literature. They were then converted into *.txt files and fed into AntMover, the computer software developed for structural move analysis by Anthony (2003). A human coder also coded the texts at two different times with a three-week interval. To avoid random carry-over effect, the human coder used the counter-balanced design in his coding of the texts. Rasmeenin’s (2006) and Yang and Allison’s (2003) frameworks were employed to identify the obligatory, conventional, and optional moves in the texts. Results indicated that topical and biographical encyclopedic entries do differ in rhetorical structure. The findings of this study can help Iranian encyclopediographers to better understand the standard structure of encyclopedia entries.

Keywords


Anthony, L. (2003). AntMover. Software Retrievable from http://antpc1.ice.ous.ac.jp/
Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43-50.
Béjoint, H. (2000). Modern lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bhatia, V. K., & Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2015). Genre analysis: The state of the art (An online interview with Vijay Kumar Bhatia). International Journal of Language Studies, 9(2), 121-130.
Birjandi, P., Alavi, S. M., & Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2004). Advanced writing. Tehran: Zabankadeh publications.
Devitt, A. J. (2004). A theory of genre: Writing genres. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar.  London: Arnold.
Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17, 433-454.
Merriam-Webster. (1995). Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of Literature. New York: Merriam-Webster Inc.
Miller, C. R. (1994). Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the New Rhetoric, (pp. 67-78). London: Taylor and Francis.
Rasmeenin, C. (2006). A structural move analysis of MA thesis discussion sections in applied linguistics. Unpublished MA thesis, Mahidol University.
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2011). The place of genre analysis in international communication. International Journal of Language Studies, 5(1), 63-74.
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2012). A structural move analysis of discussion sub-genre in applied linguistics. DacoRomania, 17(2), 199-212.
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A., & Khakbaz, N. (2011). Theses ‘Discussion’ sections: A structural move analysis. International Journal of Language Studies, 5(3), 111-132.
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A., & Montazeran, H. (2012). The book review genre: A structural move analysis. International Journal of Language Studies, 6(1), 1-30.
Smith, C. S. (2003). Modes of discourse: The local structure of texts. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 365-385.
Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2004). Research articles in applied linguistics: Structures from a functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 264-279.