The Analysis of EFL Teachers’ Attitudes on ELT Textbooks in Iran: The Case of Gender Representation and its Pedagogical Effects

Document Type : research article

Authors

1 English Language Department, Teaching, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 English Language Department, Teaching, East Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the attitudes of English language teachers regarding the representation of gender in the Vision series in the 10th, 11th, and 12th grades of senior high schools in Iran. To gather data, a questionnaire was adapted from Yaqoubi Notash and Nouri (2016) and some items were added to meet the purpose of the study. It should be noted that this questionnaire was translated to Farsi to enhance the participants’ understanding with a reliability of .88 whose validity was confirmed by experts. Then, the questionnaire was distributed among 330 male and female teachers who had experienced teaching the mentioned textbooks. To obtain more accurate data, a semi-structured interview was also designed and implemented with 15 teachers. The data were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The results of the analyses of the questionnaire and teachers' interviews showed that the majority of the teachers believed the representation of males is significantly more than females’ in the textbooks which might be due to the traditional patriarchal and cultural views in this country. In addition, the teachers assumed that gender disparitycreates gender stereotypes in the minds of the students affecting their future academic and career choices and leads to biased modeling of the genders’ social roles. The results of the present study can raise the awareness of the materials developers, curriculum designers, and those who are involved in devising textbooks considering gender inequality and representation.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Afshar, H. S. (2016). Analysis and criticism of the English language textbooks for the first grade of junior high school, with an emphasis on critical discourse analysis [Persian]. Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences, 15(3), 109-131.
Ahmad, M., & Shah, S.K. (2019). A critical discourse analysis of gender representations the content of 5th grade English language textbook. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 1-24.
Ahour, T., Towhidiyan, B., and Saeidi, M. (2014). The Eval-uation of” English Textbook 2” Taught in Iranian High Schools from Teachers’ Perspectives. English Language Teaching, 7(3), 150-158.
Al Kayed, M., Al khawaldah, S., & Alzubi, M. (2020). Critical discourse analysis of gender representations in EFL textbooks. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 9(4), 244-254.
Alavi Moghaddam, S. B., & Kheirabadi, R., (2016). Evaluation of Prospect series: A paradigm shift from GTM to CLT in Iran. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(3), 619-624.
Alavi Moqaddam, S. B., Kheir Abadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, H. (2017). Vision 1. Iranian Coursebooks Printing Press.
Alavi Moqaddam, S. B., Kheir Abadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, H. (2017). Vision 2. Iranian Coursebooks Printing Press.
Alavi Moqaddam, S. B., Kheir Abadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, H. (2017). Vision 3. Iranian Coursebooks Printing Press.
Aljuaythin, W. (2018). Gender representation in EFL textbooks in Saudi Arabia: A Critical discourse analysis approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 7(5), 151-157.
Amerian, M., & Esmaili, F. (2014). Gender representation in Iranian high school English textbooks with a critical discourse analysis perspective. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 5(4), 277-289.
Amerian, M., & Esmaili, F. (2015). Language and gender: A critical discourse analysis on gender representation in a series of international ELT textbooks. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4(2), 3-12.
Amini, M., & Birjandi, P. (2012). Gender bias in the Iranian high school EFL textbooks. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 134-147.
Amini, M., & Oj, S. (2018). Gender Bias in Iranian high school new EFL textbooks (Vision I & II). Proceedings of First National Conference on Reviewing Books and Texts of Humanities Sciences, 213-231.
Ansari, H., & Babaii, E. (2003). Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 8(2), 35-41.
Bahman, M., & Rahimi, A. (2010). Gender representation in EFL materials: an analysis of English textbooks of Iranian high schools. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 273-277.
Blumberg, R. L. (2009). The invisible obstacle to educational equality: Gender bias in textbooks. Prospects, 38(3), 3405-361.
Caldwell, E. F., & Wilbraham, S. J. (2018). Hairdressing in space: Depiction of gender in science books for children. Journal of Science & Popular Culture, 1(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1386/jspc.1.2.101_1
Curaming, E.M., & Curaming, R.A. (2020). Gender (in)equality in English textbooks in the Philippines: A critical discourse analysis. Sexuality & Culture, 24, 1167–1188.
Dahmardeh, M. (2009). Communicative textbooks: English language textbooks in Iranian secondary school. Linguistic Online, 40(4), 45-61.
Dahmardeh, M., & Kim, S. (2020). Gender representation in Iranian English language coursebooks: Is sexism still alive? English Today, 36(1), 12-22. doi:10.1017/S0266078419000117
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge.
Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (2011). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 1-35. doi: 10.1080/14792779543000002
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Fatemi, A. H., Pishghadam, R., & Heidarian, Z. (2011).  Gender  delineation  in  high school and pre-university ELT  course books:  A  criterion-Oriented  approach to  text  analysis.  The Iranian EFL Journal, 7(3), 32-47.
Gharbavi, A., & Mousavi, S. A. (2012). A content analy­sis of textbooks: Investigating gender bias as a social prominence in Iranian high school English textbooks. English Linguistics Research, 1(1), 24-49. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v1n1p42
Graham, A. (1975). The making of non-sexist dictionary. Newbury House Publishers. Hashemian, M., Iravani, M., & Salehpour, Gh. (2020). A CDA of representation of males and females in EFL textbooks of Iranian high schools: Vision Series. Journal of Language and Discourse Practice, 1 (1), 37-51.
Javani, T., & Tahriri, A. (2018). The representation of male and female social actors in Prospect EFL Series of Iranian junior high school: A CDA perspective. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 6(4), 15-23.
Lee, J. F. K. (2019). In the pursuit of a gender-equal society: Do Japanese EFL textbooks play a role? Journal of Gender Studies, 28(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2018.1423956.
Litz, D. R. (2005). Textbook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean case study. Asian EFL Journal, 48, 1-53.
Liu, K. (2016). Prioritizing criteria for evaluating cultural contents in EFL textbooks through APH. Journal of language teaching and research, (7)5, 841-850.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Matsuno, S. (2002). Sexism in Japanese radio business English program. JALT Journal, 24(1), 83–97.
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
Miri, S. S. (2019). A synchronic and diachronic analysis of gender representation in English textbooks used in Iranian high schools [MA thesis]. Middle East Technical University.
Onderwijsraad (2020). Een verkenning van sekse verschillen in het onderwijs. https://www.onderwijsraad.nl/publicaties/adviezen/2020/10/07/verkenning-sekseverschillen-onderwijs
Riazi, A. M., & Mosalanejad, N. (2010). Evaluation of learning objectives in Iranian high-school and pre-university English textbooks using Bloom’s taxonomy. TESL-EJ: The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 13(4).
Riazi, A., & Aryashokouh, A. (2007). Lexis in English textbooks in Iran: Analysis of exercises and proposals for consciousness-raising activities. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 17-34.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Sadeghi, K., & Richards, J.C. (2014). The idea of English in Iran: An example from Urmia. World Englishes.
Saputra, F. D. (2019). Gender representation in EFL textbooks. Edukasi, 6(1), 247–259.
Siren, T. (2018). Representations of men and women in English language textbooks. A critical discourse analysis of Open Road 1-7. [Master Thesis]. English Philology Faculty of Humanities University of Oulu.
Stewart, M., Walker, K., & Revelle, C. (2018).  Learning from students: What, why, and how adolescent English learners want to read and write. Texas Journal of Literacy Education, 6 (1), 23–40. https://hdl.handle.net/11274/13263
Tomlinson, B. (2013). Developing materials for language teaching (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.
Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2018). The complete guide to the theory and practice of materials development for language learning. Willey-Blackwell.
Tseng, W. T., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self­regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 78­102.
UNESCO (2022). Education for all: Global monitoring report. UNESCO Institute of Education.
Yaghoubi-Notash, M., & Nouri, Z. (2016). Inclusion/exclusion and role allocation in marketized EFL syllabus: Gender from CDA perspective. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 110-117.
Journal of Foreign Language Research
Volume 13, Issue 2
July 2023
Pages 317-334

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics