Teacher Agency in the Context of Curriculum Reform in the Iranian Educational System

Document Type : research article

Authors

1 PhD Associate Professor, Department of English, Faculty of Languages and Foreign Literature, University of Tehran, Tehran Iran

2 PhD student University of Tehran

Abstract

In line with the perspective that teachers are the most significant agents in language policy enactment, teacher agency in general and the pivotal role of agency in curriculum reforms, in particular, have received a surge of attention in recent years. This study aims to investigate the way a group of experienced EFL teachers exerted agency in the context of curriculum reform in Iran. Narrative enquiry was utilized to explore teachers’ agency by drawing on the ecological approach proposed by Priestley, Biesta, and Robinson (2015). Seven teachers (aged between 30 to 45 years) of English as a foreign language with more than 10 years of teaching experience at state high-schools participated in this study. Snowball sampling was utilized for selecting the teachers who had been involved in teaching both old and new books, designed by the Iranian Ministry of Education, for over five years. The results indicated that the teachers construct agency in order to cope with the changes in the curriculum by adhering to many past experiences, creating an image of the future, and enacting the curriculum despite the challenges. This study also highlighted the importance of teacher agency in professional development and improvement of education and learning in the time of curriculum reform.

Keywords

References

Baldauf Jr, R. B. (2006). Rearticulating the case for micro language planning in a language ecology context. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2-3), 147-170.
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624-640.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
Canale, G. (2016). (Re) Searching culture in foreign language textbooks, or the politics of hide and seek. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 29(2), 225-243.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency?. The American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962-1023.
Etelapelto, A., Vahasantanen, K., & Hokka, P. (2015). How do novice teachers in Finland perceive their professional agency?. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 660-680.
Glasgow, G. P. (2017). Policy, agency and the (non) native teacher: “English classes in English” in Japan’s high schools. In C.L. Ng. Patrick & F. Esther (Eds), Teacher agency and policy response in English language teaching (pp. 70-85). London: Routledge.
Gurney, L., & Liyanage, I. (2016). EAL teacher agency: implications for participation in professional development. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 11(1), 49-59.
Ho, S. T. K. (2009). Addressing culture in EFL classrooms: The challenge of shifting from a traditional to an intercultural stance. Electronic journal of foreign language teaching, 6(1), 63-76.
Johnson, D. C. (2018). Teachers’ language policy engagement: European perspectives and challenges. Language and Education, 32(5), 462-469.
Kheirabadi, R., & Alavi Moghaddam, S. B. (2013). New horizons in teaching English in Iran: A transition from reading-based methods to communicative ones by “English for School Series”. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 5(4), 225-232.
Kherzerlou, E., & Pourfeiz, J. (2012). Iranian and Turkish EFL Teachers’ Perceptions on Teacher Autonomy in Curriculum Development. In Z.  Akşit & M. Çavuş (Eds). Embracing Challenges; Proceedings of the 11th METU International ELT Convention (pp. 199-219). Turkey: Middle East Technical University.
Lai, C., Li, Z., & Gong, Y. (2016). Teacher agency and professional learning in crosscultural teaching contexts: Accounts of Chinese teachers from international schools in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 12-21.
Langum, V., & Sullivan, K. P. (2017). Writing academic English as a doctoral student in Sweden: narrative perspectives. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 20-25.
Li, M. (2010). EFL teachers and English language education in the PRC: Are they the policy makers? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 439–51.
Liddicoat, A., & Baldauf, R. (2008). Language planning in local contexts: Agents, contexts and interactions. In A. Liddicoat & R. Baldauf, Jr. (Eds.), Language planning and policy: Language planning in local contexts (pp. 3–17). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Liyanage, I., Bartlett, B., Walker, T., & Guo, X. (2014). Assessment policies, curricular directives, and teacher agency: Quandaries of EFL teachers in Inner Mongolia. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(3), 251-264.
Martin, P. (2005a). Talking knowledge into being in an upriver primary school in Brunei. In A. S. Canagarajah (Ed.), Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. (pp. 225-246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Martin, P. W. (2005b). "Safe" language practices in two rural schools in Malaysia: Tensions between policy and practice. In A. M. Y. Lin & P. W. Martin (Eds.), Decolonisation, globalisation: Language-in-education policy and practice (pp. 74-97). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
Menken, K., & Garcia, O. (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. New York, NY: Routledge.
Molina, S. C. (2017). English language teaching in China: Teacher agency in response to curricular innovations. In C.L. Ng. Patrick & F. Esther (Eds), Teacher agency and policy response in English language teaching (pp. 7-25). London: Routledge.
Nguyen, H. T. M., & Bui, T. (2016). Teachers’ agency and the enactment of educational reform in Vietnam. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(1), 88-105.
Obaidul Hamid, M. & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2016). Globalization, English Language Policy, and Teacher Agency: Focus on Asia. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 15(1), 26-43
Obaidul Hamid, M. (2010). Globalisation, English for everyone and English teacher capacity: Language policy discourses and realities in Bangladesh. Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(4), 289-310.
Ollerhead, S., & Ollerhead, S. (2010). Teacher agency and policy response in the adult ESL literacy classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 44(3), 606-618.
Pantić, N. (2015). A model for study of teacher agency for social justice. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 759-778.
Pappa, S., Moate, J., Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., & Etelapelto, A. (2019). Teacher agency within the Finnish CLIL context: Tensions and resources. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 593-613.
Parker, G. (2016). An ecological approach to teacher agency: A theoretical overview. Annual Review of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, 13, 1-14.
Priestley, M. Biesta, G. & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as Agents of Change: Teacher Agency and Emerging Models of Curriculum. In Priestley, M. & Biesta, G. (Eds.). Reinventing the Curriculum: New Trends in Curriculum Policy and Practice (pp. 187–206). New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Miller, K., & Priestley, A. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191-214.
Pyhalto, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2014). Comprehensive school teachers’ professional agency in large-scale educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 15(3), 303-325.
Razavipour, K., & Rezagah, K. (2018). Language assessment in the new English curriculum in Iran: Managerial, institutional, and professional barriers. Language Testing in Asia, 8(9), 1-18.
Schulz, R. A. (2007). The challenge of assessing cultural understanding in the context of foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 9-26.
Simpson, A., Sang, G., Wood, J., Wang, Y., & Ye, B. (2018). A dialogue about teacher agency: Australian and Chinese perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 316-326.
Tajeddin, Z., & Teimournezhad, S. (2015). Exploring the hidden agenda in the representation of culture in international and localized ELT textbooks. The Language Learning Journal, 43(2), 180-193.
Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curricular reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 346-355.
Toom, A., Pyhalto, K., & Rust, F. O. C. (2015). Teachers’ professional agency in contradictory times. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 615-623.
Tran, H. (2018). Teacher agency in times of educational change: the case of transitioned teachers in Vietnam. Current Issues in Language Planning, 20(5), 544-559.
Vitanova, G. (2018). “Just treat me as a teacher!” Mapping language teacher agency through gender, race, and professional discourses. System, 79, 28-37.
Wang, H. (2008). Language policy implementation: A look at teachers’ perceptions. Asian EFL Journal, 30(1), 1-38.
Wang, Q. (2007). The national curriculum changes and their effects on English language teaching in the people’s republic of china. In J. Cummins & Ch. Davison (Eds). International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 87–105). New York: Springer.
Wang, Y., Mu, G. M., & Zhang, L. (2017). Chinese inclusive education teachers' agency within temporal-relational contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 115-123.
Yang, H. (2015). Teacher mediated agency in educational reform in China. New York: Springer.
 Zacharias, N. T. (2013). Navigating through the English-medium-of-instruction policy: Voices from the field. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 93-108.
Zhang, Y. & Hu, G. (2010). Between intended and enacted curricula: Three teachers and a mandated curricular reform in mainland China. In K. Menken & O. García(Eds). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers (pp. 122–141). New York, NY: Routledge.
منابع فارسی:
خیرآبادی، ر. و علوی مقدم س. ب. (۱۳۹۸).  فرصت ها و چالش های فراروی آموزش زبان انگلیسی در نظام آموزش رسمی ایران. پژوهش­های زبانشناختی در زبان­های خارجی. ۹(۱)، ۵۳-۷۰.
کیوان پناه، ش.، علوی، س. م.، و طبایی فرد، س. ج. (۱۳۹۲). ارزیابی برنامه جدید آموزش زبان انگلیسی پایه های اول و دوم دبیرستان. پژوهش­های زبانشناختی در زبان­های خارجی. ۴(۱)، ۸۳-۱۰۶
Journal of Foreign Language Research
Volume 11, Issue 1
June 2021
Pages 27-46

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics