Linguistic meaning as a physiologic cell: Proposing a cellular-cognitive schema of meaning

Document Type : research article

Author

Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This study aims to propose a new definition of ‘meaning’ using corpus linguistics. The framework used in the current study is the Dooley and Levinsohn’s (2001) model of functional-cognitive approach. The corpus of the study contains 4 narratives (two English narratives and two Turkish ones). The results of the study show that meaning develops like a cell. As far as the study is concerned, meaning, as a physiologic cell, can be imagined as a cellular-cognitive schema. According to the cellular-cognitive schema, meaning is built in three steps like giving a birth (to a baby or a butterfly). That is, the birth of a baby, a butterfly, and meaning follow the same pattern. In the mentioned items, a cell or a unit (caterpillar regarding butterfly, sperm regarding baby, word regarding meaning) is located in the initial step. In the second step, there happens to be a cell/unit growth (butterfly: egg, caterpillar, chrysalis, butterfly; baby: sperm, getting flesh/bone, baby; language: word gets new information). And in the final step, the cell/unit turns into a live creature (a caterpillar turns into a butterfly, a sperm turns into a baby, a word gets its meaning). Each of the items is produced in its context (sperm in mother’s womb, butterfly in its living environment, and language in linguistic context).

Keywords

References

قرآن کریم.
حریری اکبری، محمد (۱۳۹۰). فؤییه تون: سیری در فرهنگ آذربایجان. تبریز. یاران.
کرمی، مریم و حجتی، حمید (۱۳۹۱). مرور جامع پرستاری بهداشت مادران و نوزادان. چاپ پنجم. تهران. جامعه نگر. 
نعمت، ووقار (۱۳۹۶). گؤیدن اوچ آلما دوشدو: آذربایجان شیفاهی خالق ناغیل­لاری و افسانه­لری (قارارداغ بؤلگه­سی). تبریز. بهاردخت.
Alberts, B., Hopkin, K., Johnson, A. D., Morgan, D., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Walter, P. (2019). Essential cell biology. Fifth edition. W. W. Norton and Company.
Bickerton, D. (2016). Roots of language. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Bickerton, D. (1990). Language and species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Evans, V. (2007). A glossary of cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
Delforooz, B. B. (2010). Discourse features in Balochi of Sistan (Oral narratives). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
Dooley, R. A. and Levinsohn, S. H,. (2001). Analyzing discourse: A manual of basic concepts. SIL International.
Kazemi, F. (2013). Layer theme, A new concept in functionalism. Foreign Language Research Journal, 3(2), 313-350. doi: 10.22059/jflr.2013.57275.
Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In Raymond W. Gibbs, JR (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (17-38) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nourzaei, M. (2017). Participant reference in three Balochi dialects: Male and female narrations of folktales and biographical tales. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
Margetts, A. (2015). Person shift at narrative peak. Language, 91(4), 755-805.
Roberts, J. (2009). A study of Persian discourse structure. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
Sanford, A. and S. Garrod (1981). Understanding written language. Wiley.
Yule, G. (2010) . The study of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Watson, D. (1994). The Wordsworth dictionary of musical quotations. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Reference.
Journal of Foreign Language Research
Volume 10, Issue 4
February 2021
Pages 800-813

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics