مقایسه کارهای هوشیارسازی دستوری و برون داد مدیریت شده بر مهارت گفتاری زبان آموزان

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی(عادی)

نویسندگان

انگلیسی، دانشکده زبانهای خارجی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف از این مطالعه، مقایسه کارهای ارتقای آگاهی دستوری و برون داد مدیریت شده بر مهارت گفتاری زبان آموزان بوده است. بدین منظور، 66 زبان آموز دختر در یکی از آموزشگاههای تهران با برگزاری آزمون ابتدایی انگلیسی (پت) بین 91 زبان آموز انتخاب گردیده و در دو گروه آزمایشی قرار گرفتند. در ابتدا، هر دو گروه در پیش آزمون گفتاری شرکت کرده و همگن شدند و تحت آموزش در یک دوره 18 جلسه ای با صرف زمان مساوی برای هر گروه قرار گرفتند. در گروه آزمایشی اول، کارهای ارتقای آگاهی و در گروه آزمایشی دوم، کارهای برون داد مدیریت شده ارائه گردیدند. در پایان دوره، پس آزمون گفتاری دیگری از هر دو گروه آزمایشی گرفته شد. برای آزمون فرضیه مطرح شده از آزمون نمونه های مستقل تی استفاده گردید و نتیجه آن بود که مهارت گفتاری گروه کارهای ارتقای آگاهی به شکل معناداری نسبت به گروه کارهای برون داد مدیریت شده برتری داشتند. کاربرد این پژوهش برای معلمین و طراحان مطالب درسی در انتهای مقاله به تفصیل بحث شده اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparing Consciousness-Raising Tasks and Managed Output Tasks in Speaking Classes

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamid Marashi
  • Nargess Khavarian
English, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The present study was an attempt to investigate the comparative effect of consciousness-raising tasks and managed output tasks on EFL learners’ speaking. Accordingly, 66 female English language learners selected out of an initial 91 intermediate EFL learners based on their performance on a sample piloted PET took part in the study. Both groups were taught by the same teacher and they used the same course book. Moreover, they received the same hours of instruction and teaching aids in the same physical environment; therefore, the most significant point of departure in the two experimental groups in the present study was the form of speaking practices presented in the classroom. Each group enjoyed its own specific speaking development procedure throughout the treatment period. The findings of this study revealed that the participants’ speaking improved significantly in the consciousness-raising group compared to the managed output group. The findings of this study could be used by EFL teachers and syllabus designers to develop more efficient second language speaking courses.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • ELT
  • task-based language teaching
  • consciousness-raising tasks
  • managed output tasks
  • speaking
-8 منابع
Adams, R. (2003). L2 output, reformulation and noticing: Implications for IL
development. Language Teaching Research, 7 (3) , 347-376.
Amirian, S. M. R. , & Abbasi, S. (2014). The effect of grammatical consciousnessraising
tasks on Iranian EFL learners’ knowledge of grammar. Procedia – Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 98, 251-257.
Bijani, H. , & Khabiri, M. (2017). Direct and semi-direct validation: Test takers’
perceptions, evaluations, and anxiety towards speaking module of an English
proficiency test. Journal of Language and Translation, 7 (1) , 25-41.
Brown, H. D. (2008). Teaching by principles. An interactive approach to language
pedagogy (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Longman.
Burns, A. , & Joyce, H. (1997). Focus on speaking. Sydney: National Centre for English
Language Teaching and Research.
Burns, A. , & Richards, J. C. (2009). The Cambridge guide to second language teacher
education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bygate, M. (1998). Theoretical perspectives on speaking. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 18 (1) , 20-42.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in
the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing,
12, 267-296.
Chaney, A. L. , & Burk, T. L. (1998). Teaching oral communication in grades K-8.
Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ:
LEA.
De la Fuente, M. J. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: The roles
of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words. Studies in
Second Language Acquisition, 24 (1) , 81-112.
مقایسة کارهای هوشیارسازی دستوری و برونداد مدیریت شده بر مهارت گفتاری زبا نآموزان 213
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit
knowledge? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (2) , 223-236.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Gan, Z. (2008). Extroversion and group oral performance: A mixed quantitative and
discourse analysis approach. The Hong Kong Institute of Education, 23 (3) , 24-42.
Gilabert, R. (2007). The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along planning
time and (+/–Here-and-Now): Effects on L2 oral production. In M. Del Pilar Garcia-
Mayo (Ed.) , Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 44-68). Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters.
Haight, C. , Herron, C. , & Cole, S. (2007). The effects of deductive and guided
inductive instructional approaches on the learning of grammar in the elementary
foreign language college classroom. Classroom Foreign Language Annals, 40 (2) ,
288-310.
Hanaoka, O. (2007). Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of
spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task. Language Teaching
Research, 11, 459-480.
Harmer, J. (2006). The practice of English language teaching. London: Pearson.
Hedge, T. (2008). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Hinkle, E. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching the four skills. TESOL Quarterly, 40
(1) , 63-94.
Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An
experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
24, 541-577.
Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning:
In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied
Linguistics, 24 (2) , 168-196.
Izumi, S. , Bigelow, M. , Fujiwara, M. , & Fearnow, S. (1999). Testing the output
hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Studies in
Second Language Acquisition, 21, 421-452.
Izumi, Y. , & Izumi, S. (2004). Investigating the effects of oral output on the learning of
relative clauses in English: Issues in the psycholinguistic requirements for effective
output tasks. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60 (5) , 587-609.
Kawauchi, C. (2005). The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of learners
with low and high intermediate L2 proficiency. In R. Ellis (Ed.) , Planning and task
performance in a second language (pp. 143-164). Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins.
214 پژوهش های زبانشناختی در زبان های خارجی، دورة 9، شمارة 1، فروردین 1398
Khabiri, M. , & Lavasani, M. (2012). A collaborative approach to autonomy: Does it
improve EFL learners’ oral proficiency? World Applied Sciences Journal, 20 (9) ,
1293-1299.
Khany, R. , & Ghoreyshi, M. (2013). The nexus between Iranian EFL students’ big five
personality traits and foreign language speaking confidence. European Online
Journal of Natural and Social Science (special Issue on teaching and learning) , 2
(2) , 601-611.
Kim, Y.) 2011). The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2
vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, (61) 1, 100-140.
Koosha, B. , Ketabi, S. , & Kassaian, Z. (2011). The effects of self-esteem, age, and
gender on the speaking skill of intermediate university EFL learners. Theory and
Practice in Language Studies, 1 (10) , 1328-1337.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001). Teaching grammar. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.) , Teaching
English as a second or foreign language (pp. 251-266). Boston, MA: Heinle &
Heinle.
Latchem, C. , Latchem, C. R. , & Jung, I. (2010). Distance and blended learning in Asia.
New York: Taylor & Francis.
Leeser, M. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue.
Language Teaching Research, 8 (1) , 55-81.
Lotfipour-Saedi, K. (2015). Suggestions toward some discourse-analytic approaches to
text difficulty: with special reference to ‘T-unit configuration’ in the textual
unfolding. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3 (1) , 1-18.
Malmir, A. , & Shoorcheh, S. (2012). An investigation of the impact of teaching critical
thinking on the Iranian EFL learners' speaking skill. Journal of Language Teaching
and Research, 3 (4) , 608-617.
Marashi, H. , & Hatam, G. (2009). Using tasks in a content-based program: Does it
enhance vocabulary learning? Iranian Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign
Language and Literature, 1 (4) , 73-91.
Marashi, H. , & Kordbacheh, S. (2014). Using inductive and deductive consciousness
raising tasks to improve field-dependent and field-independent EFL learners’
grammar. Iranian EFL Journal, 10 (3) , 60-75.
Marashi, H. , & Zargari, M. (2017). Mixing explicit grammar instruction with TBLT to
improve autonomy and writing. Iranian EFL Journal, 13 (2) , 78-100.
Mohamed, N. (2004). Consciousness-raising tasks: A learner perspective. ELT Journal,
58 (3) , 228-237.
Moradkhan, D. , & Sohrabian, R. (2009). Grammatical consciousness-raising tasks and
the improvement of Iranian students’ knowledge of grammar. Journal of Teaching
English as a Foreign Language and Literature, 1 (4) , 57-70.
مقایسة کارهای هوشیارسازی دستوری و برونداد مدیریت شده بر مهارت گفتاری زبا نآموزان 215
Muranoi, H. (2007). Output practice in the L2 classroom. In R. M. DeKeyser, Practice in
a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology
(pp. 51-84). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nakatani, Y. (2005). The effects of awareness-raising training on oral communication
strategy use. The Modern Language Journal, 89 (1) , 76-91.
Nassaji, H. , & Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of
grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126-145.
Nowicka, A. , & Wilczyn´ska, W. (2011). Authenticity in oral communication of
instructed L2 learners. In M. Pawlak, E. Waniek-Klimczak, & J. Majer (Eds.) ,
Speaking and instructed foreign language acquisition (pp. 24-42). New York:
Multilingual Matters.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Pan, W. (2012). Empirical study on the effects of noticing in EFL. Journal of Language
Teaching and Research, 3 (6) , 1242-1249.
Plews, J. , & Zhao, K. (2010). Tinkering with tasks knows no bounds: ESL teachers’
adaptations of task-based language-teaching. TESL Canada Journal, 28 (1) , 41-59.
Pourdana, N. , Karimi Behbahani, M. , & Safdari, M. (2011). The impact of task types on
aspects of Iranian EFL learners' writing performance: Accuracy, fluency, and
complexity. IPEDR, 20, 261-265.
Rassaei, E. (2012). The effects of input-based and output-based instruction on L2
development. TESL-EJ, 16 (3) , 1-25.
Rezaei, A. A. , & Hosseinpur, R. M. (2011). On the role of consciousness-raising tasks in
learning grammar: A learner perspective. Iranian EFL Journal, 7 (4) , 239-240.
Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking: From theory to practice.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. , & Reppen, R. (2014). Towards a pedagogy of grammar instruction.
RELC Journal, 45 (1) , 5-25.
Sarani, A. , Mousapour Negari, G. , & Ghaviniat, M. (2013). The role of task type in L2
vocabulary acquisition: A case of involvement load hypothesis. Acta Scientarium:
Language and Culture, 35 (4) , 377-386.
Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role
of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.) , Attention and awareness
in foreign language learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii,
Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
Sharwood Smith, M. A. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner.
Applied Linguistics, 2 (2) , 159-168.
216 پژوهش های زبانشناختی در زبان های خارجی، دورة 9، شمارة 1، فروردین 1398
Shehadeh, A. (2003). Learner output, hypothesis testing, and internalizing linguistic
knowledge. System, 31 (2) , 155-171.
Soleimani, H. , Ketabi, S. , & Talebinejad, M. (2007). The effect of output fronted
activities to enhance learners’ noticing and acquisition of rhetorical structure of
contrast paragraphs. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10 (2) , 141-166.
Song, M. J. , & Suh, B. R. (2008). The effects of output task types on noticing and
learning of the English past counterfactual conditional. System, 36, 295-312.
Spolsky, B. (2018). The Cambridge handbook of language policy. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Sugiharto, S. (2006). Grammar consciousness-raising: Research, theory, and application.
Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 2 (2) , 140-148.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of managed and managed
output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.) , Input in second language
acquisition (pp. 235-256). New York: Newbury House.
Tajeddin, Z. , & Hosseinpur, R. M. (2014). The role of consciousness-raising tasks on
EFL learners’ microgenetic development of request pragmatic knowledge. Iranian
Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17 (1) , 147-187.
Ur, P. (2006). A course in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Branden, K. (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vercellotti, M. L. (2015). The development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in
second language performance: A longitudinal study. Applied Linguistics, 36 (2) , 1-
25.
Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for Task-Based Learning. London: Longman.
Willis, J. , & Willis, D. (1996). Challenge and change in language teaching. London:
Heinemann.
Yip, V. (1994). Consciousness-raising and learn ability. In T. Odlin (Ed.) , Perspectives
on pedagogical grammar (pp. 123-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zuckerman, M. (2005). Psychology of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
دوره 9، شماره 1
طی شماره 173662/18 مورخ 22/7/1397 دفتر سیاست‌گذاری و برنامه‌ریزی امور پژوهشی وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری، با تغییر ترتیب انتشار نشریه از دو فصلنامه به فصلنامه موافقت شده است.
اردیبهشت 1398
صفحه 193-216