خدایی، ابراهیم. (1388). الف. بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر قبولی در آزمون کارشناسی ارشد.
فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامهریزی در آموزش عالی. شماره 54، صص 34–19.
http://journal.irphe.ac.ir
نیستانی، محمدرضا. (1391). برنامه ریزی آموزشی راهبردهای بهبود کیفیت در سطح یک واحد (مدرسه، واحد دانشگاهی و آموزش مجازی) اصفهان: آموخته.
Amirian, S. M. R., Alavi, S. M., & Fidalgo, A. M. (2014). Detecting gender DIF
with an English proficiency test in EFL context. Iranian Journal of Language
Testing, 4(2).
Barati, H., & Ahmadi, A. R. (2010). Gender–based DIF across the subject area:
A study of the Iranian National University Entrance Exam. The Journal of
Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 2(3), 1–22.
study-of-the-iranian-national-university-entrance-exam
Barnes, B. J., & Wells, C. S. (2009). Differential item functional analysis by
gender and race of the national doctoral program survey. International Journal
of Doctoral Studies, 4, 77–96.
Chen, J., Torre, J., & Zhang, Z. (2013). Relative and absolute fit evaluation in
cognitive diagnosis modeling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(2),
123–140.
De La Torre, J. (2009). A cognitive diagnosis model for cognitively based
multiple-choice options. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 163–183.
DiBello, L. V., Roussos, L., & Stout, W. F. (2007). Review of cognitively
diagnostic assessment and a summary of psychometric models. In: Rao CR,
Sinharay S (eds) Handbook of statistics, vol 26. Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp 979–
1030.
Doudeen, H., & Annabi, H. (2008). Sex-Related Differential Item Functioning
(DIF) Analysis of TIMSS. Educational Sciences, 35(697).
Embretson (Whitely), S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation
versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179-197.
Falmagne, J. C., &Doignon, J. P. (1988). A class of stochastic procedures for
assessment of knowledge. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical
Finch, H. (2005). The MIMIC method as a method for detecting DIF:
Comparison with Mantel-Haenszel, SIBTEST, and the IRT likelihood ratio.
Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 278–295.
Gao, L., & Rogers, W. T. (2010). Use of tree-based regression in the analyses of L2 reading test items. Language Testing, 28(2), 1–28.
Haagenars, J., & McCutcheon, A. (2002). Applied latent class analysis.
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of
item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Hartz, S. M. (2002). A bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing
cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practicality. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential item functioning and the
Mantel- Haenszel procedure. In H. Wainer & H. I. Braun (Eds.), Test validity
(pp. 129–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hou, L., de la Torre, J., & Nandakumar, R. (2014). Differential item functioning
assessment in cognitive diagnosis modeling: Applying Wald test to investigate
DIF for DINA model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 98–125.
Jang, E. E. (2005). A validity narrative: Effects of reading skills diagnosis on
teaching and learning in the context of NG TOEFL. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Jang, E. E. (2009). Cognitive diagnostic assessment of L2 reading
comprehension ability: Validity arguments for Fusion Model application to
LanguEdge assessment. Language Testing, 26(1), 31–73.
Leighton, j., & Gierl, M. (Eds). (2007). Cognitive diagnostic assessment for
education: Theory and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Li, F. M. (2008). A modified higher-order DINA model for detecting differential
item functioning and differential attribute functioning. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, University of Georgia.
Li, H. (2011). A cognitive diagnostic analysis of the MELAB reading test. Spaan
Fellow, 9, 17– 46.
Li, H. & Suen, H. K. (2013). Constructing and validating a Q-matrix for
cognitive diagnostic analyses of a reading test, Educational Assessment, 18(1),
Li, X. & Wang, W. C. (2015). Assessment of differential Iiem functioning under
cognitive diagnosis models: The DINA model example. Journal of Educational
Lim, Y. (2015). Cognitive diagnostic model comparisons. PhD Dissertation
submitted to the Georgia Institute of Technology.
2015.pdf
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing
problems. Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mantel, N. (1963). Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom: Extensions of
the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Journal of the American Statistical
Mantel, N., & Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data
from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Inst, 22,
Pae, T. I. (2004). Gender effect on reading comprehension with Korean EFL
Penfield, R. D., & Camilli, G. (2007). “Differential item functioning and item
bias”. In C.R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of statistics, Vol. 26
Ranjbaran, F., & Alavi, S. M. (2017). Developing a reading comprehension test
for cognitive diagnostic assessment: A RUM analysis. Studies in Educational
Evaluation, 55, 167–179.
Roever, C. (2007). DIF in the Assessment of second language pragmatics.
Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(2), 165–189.
Rupp, A. A., & J., Templin. (2008). Unique characteristics of diagnostic
classification models: a comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art.
Meas Interdiscip Res Perspect, 6, 219–262.
Rupp, A. A, Templin, J, & R. A., Henson. (2010). Diagnostic measurement:
theory, methods, and applications. Guilford, New York.
Shanmugam, S. K. S., & Lan, O. S. (2014). The validity of administering
bilingual mathematics test among malasian bilingual students using
Differential Item Function (DIF). Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and
Shealy, R., & Stout, W. F. (1993a). An item response theory model for test bias.
In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 197–
329). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shealy, R., & Stout, W. F. (1993b). A model-based standardization approach that
separates true bias/DIF from group differences and detects test bias/DTF as
well as item bias/DIF. Psychometrika, 58, 159–194.
Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1989). Implications of cognitive psychology for
educational measurement. American Council on Education.
Song, X., Cheng, L., & Klinger, D. (2015). DIF investigations across groups of
gender and academic background in a large-scale high-stakes language test.
Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning
using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27,
Tatsuoka, K. K. (1983). Rule space: an approach for dealing with misconception
based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20(4),
Tatsuoka, K. K. (1990). Toward an integration of item-response theory and
cognitive error diagnosis. In N. Fredericksen, R. Glaser, A. Lesgold, & M. G.
Shafto (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition (pp.
453–488). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Wainer, H. (1988). Use of item response theory in
the study of group differences in trace lines. In H. Wainer & H. I. Braun
(Eds.), Test validity (pp. 147–169). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Young, J. W., Morgan, R., Rybinski, P., Steinberg, J., & Wang, Y. (2013).
Assessing the Test Information Function and Differential Item Functioning for
the TOEFL Junior® Standard Test. ETS Research Report Series, 1, i-27.
Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A Handbook on the theory and methods of differential item
functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for
binary and Likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of
Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.
Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Three generations of DIF analysis: Considering where
it has been, where it is now, and where it is going. Language Assessment
)