AI Literacy Among English Language Learners in Iran: Examining the Opportunities and Challenges

Document Type : research article

Authors

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literature, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

10.22059/jflr.2026.410896.1274

Abstract

In response to the rapid evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in language education, this study aimed to develop an AI literacy model and elucidate its instructional implications among Iranian EFL learners. An exploratory mixed-methods design was employed; in the qualitative phase, data were extracted through semi-structured interviews and Grounded Theory analysis, while in the quantitative phase, the resulting model was tested on 200 language learners using factor analysis, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), and fit indices via SPSS and Smart PLS software. Qualitative findings revealed one central category and six primary components: ‘Literacy and Awareness Levels,’ ‘The Role of Education and Media,’ ‘AI Functions,’ ‘Challenges and Constraints,’ ‘Benefits and Applications,’ and ‘Policy-making and Ethics,’ which were organized into 27 conceptual codes. Quantitative results indicated that these components accounted for 47.85% of the total variance of the construct. Furthermore, the structural model predicted 71.4% (R2 = 0.714) of the variance in AI literacy, which, coupled with a Goodness of Fit (GOF) index of 0.641, signifies a robust and satisfactory model fit. The findings suggest that while AI offers opportunities such as immediate feedback, personalized learning, and enhanced motivation, it also presents challenges including diminished human interaction, lack of cultural context comprehension, content inaccuracies, and cognitive dependency. Consequently, the implementation of formal AI literacy courses, ethics-based instruction, and the development of indigenous tools are essential for the safe and effective utilization of this technology. The proposed model provides a practical framework for policymakers and language educators.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Esfandyari, S., & Ghamari, P. (2024). A systematic review of the impact of generative AI models (ChatGPT, Gemini) on English Language Teaching (ELT): Opportunities and challenges. Linguistic Research in Foreign Languages, 14(4), 611-641.
Khorasani, H. (2021). Investigating the impact of emerging technologies on foreign language teaching. Journal of Research and Innovation in Education and Development, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.61838/jsied.1.3.1
Molavi Nafehi, A., Maddahian, M., & Hosseini, S. M. (2025). Generative AI and the transformation of literary translation: A qualitative study of literature students' perspectives. Linguistic Research in Foreign Languages, 15(2), 171-193.
Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285-309.
Dou, A,. Xu, W,. Li, X,. Zhang, S,. Zhang, J. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Language Learning. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 23(1): 7-19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.385045.
Edmett, A,. Ichaporia, N,. Crompton, H,. Crichton, Ross. (2023). Artificial intelligence and English language teaching: Preparing for the future. British Council. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57884/78ea-3c69.
Fan, J,. Zhang, Q. (2024). From literacy to learning: The sequential mediation of attitudes and enjoyment in AI-assisted EFL education. Heliyon, 10(17). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37158.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2018). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2 nd ed.). Sage Publications.
He, M,. Abbasi, B N,. He, J. (2025). AI-driven language learning in higher education: an empirical study on self-reflection, creativity, anxiety, and emotional resilience in EFL learners. Humanities and Social Sciences Communication. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05817-5.
Kline, R.B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4 th ed). Guilford Publications.
Lerias, E,. Guerra, C, G,. Silveira Ferreira, Paulo, Jorge,. (2024). Literacy in Artificial Intelligence as a challenge for Teaching in Higher Education: A Case Study at Portalegre Polytechnic University. Information, 15(4): 205. DOI:10.3390/info15040205.
Lintner, T,. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy scales. npj science of learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00264-4
Menyhei, Z., & Szoke, J. (2025). AI Literacy in the Language Classroom: Facilitating Critical, Ethical and Responsible Use. ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaf037.
Prado, M.C.(2024). Promoting AI Literacy among English Language and Translation Majors. Innovative Teaching & Learning. 6(1):7-25.  http://doi.org/10.4208/itl.20240103.
Shafiee Rad, H. (2025). Reinforcing L2 reading comprehension through artificial intelligence intervention: refining engagement to foster self-regulated learning.  Smart Learning Environments, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00377-2.
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: the relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education.  International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
Wu, J. G,. Lee, S,. Zhang, D,. & Szabo, C,. (2025). Cultivating AI literacy in Language Education: theorical discussions and practical applications. DE GRUYTER. Published online November 3, 2025; 5(2):169-174. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2025-0023
Zhao, Y,. Michal, A,. Thain, N,. Subramonyam, H,. (2025). Thinking Like a Scientist: Can Interactive Simulations Foster Critical AI Literacy? Research Gate, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.21090. pp: 28.