Examining the components of the curriculum "media translation" in the field of German language and literature at the bachelor's level

Document Type : research article

Authors

Department of German Language and Literature, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literature, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

10.22059/jflr.2024.377522.1137

Abstract

In the era of globalization and the domination of information-oriented media, the need for language specialists in the field of media translation is strongly felt. This need arises from the continuous growth and evolution of the media industry, which creates a greater demand for the training of translators. But by examining various aspects of media text translation training in Iran, it is concluded that the educational goals are not realized due to the lack of consideration of the structure of the media and the function of this type of translation. The aim of this thesis is to rely on the framework of the Scopus theory and translation theories such as "functional translation", "theory of descriptive studies of translation" and other dominant theories on the science of translation, "headline writing" of the media translation course in the undergraduate language course and examine German literature at the offering universities as well. This descriptive research examines the data of the subject of this course approved by the Ministry of Science and provides qualitative analyzes for this purpose. In this research, after analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of the course, scientific and practical solutions for processing and transferring media translation skills are presented to students, and in this regard, based on the scientific analysis, suggestions are made to overcome the weaknesses. The result of this article shows that there is a need to provide a supplementary course or even a specialized course in media translation.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Moghadam Cherkari Jiran (2020): Critique of the teaching of Western translation theories in two textbooks for literary translation education in Iran. In: Critical Journal of Texts and Programs in the Humanities, Volume 20, Issue 8, pp. 355-368.
  2. Ghasemi Nejad Bahram Abadi, Mehdi, Heydari, Farokh Laghha (2023): The impact of awareness of text structure on comprehension and recall of argumentative texts among Iranian learners of English. In: Journal of Linguistic Research in Foreign Languages, University of Tehran, Volume 13, Issue 4, December 2023, pp. 578-563.
  3. Moharramzadeh, Behnam, Shoubiri, Leila, Hayati Ashtiani, Karim (2024): The effectiveness of intercultural education on pragmatic competence and interest in literary content: A case study of undergraduate students (semesters 5-8) in the French language program at Iranian universities. In: Journal of Linguistic Research in Foreign Languages, University of Tehran, Volume 14, Issue 1, June 2024, pp. 168-151.
  4. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Complete Field-List, 2024.
  5. Arzjani, F. (2020). Zur Stellung der Landeskunde in den Curricula des Studienfachs „Deutsche Sprache mit dem Schwerpunkt Übersetzungswissenschaft“ an iranischen Universitäten. R u m e l i D E D i l v e E d e b i y a t A r a ş t ı r m a l a r ı D e r g i s i, 709-741.
  6. Bessadi, N. (2023, September ). Media Translation: Navigating Complexities. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/media-translation-nourredine-bessadi/
  7. Bausch, Ch. (2016). Handbuch Fremsprachenunterricht . München, Basel, Wien: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag.
  8. Bhuttah, T., & Ullah, H. & Javed, S. (2019). Analysis of Curriculum Development Stages from the Perspective of Tyler, Taba and Wheeler. European Journal of Social Sciences, 14-22. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349835298
  9. Frye, R. N. (1975). The Cambridge History of Iran. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved,https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-history-of-iran/bibliography/504AFB7EEC9F0BCE3BC6E793DAD7850C
  10. Gambier, Y. & Doorslaer, L. (2009). The Metalanguage of Translation. Special issue of Target 19 (2). [Also available in book form with the same title. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  11. Helbig, G. (2001). Deutsch als Fremsprache. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  12. Heydarian, H. (2001). Master's degree in translation: unspoken words. Translation Studies Quarterly No. 2, 75-82.
  13. Horn Jr., R. A. (2007). The Praeger Handbook of Education and Psychology (Joe L. Kincheloe ed.). Praeger Publishers. Retrieved from https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/62862118/Situated_cognition_Vygotskian_thought_an20200407-44895-ooyex6-libre.pdf?1586282325=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DSituated_cognition_Vygotskian_thought_an.pdf&Expires=1707288724&Signature
  14. Katan, D. (2012). Cultural Approaches to Translatio. Università del Salento. Retrieved https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319324747_Cultural_Approaches_to_Translation.
  15. Kautz, U., Das Handbuch Didaktik des Übersetzens und Dolmetschens, 2002, München, iudicium
  16. Károly, Krisztina et al. (2012). Szövegkohézió és sajtófordítás: Kohéziós eltolódások. Fordítástudomány. Vol. XIV, No. 2., 30–67.
  17. Khazai Farid, E. (2001). Ein Blick auf den Lehrplan des Masterstudiengangs Übersetzung. Translator's Quarterly Nr. 35, 65-67.
  18. Khosh Saligheh, M. (2014). Target abilities in Farsi and English translator training. Translation Studies Quarterly No. 47, 113-143.
  19. Kloster, I. (2021): Methoden der empirischen Translationswissenschaft und ihr Einsatz in der ostslawischen Übersetzung: Beobachtung, Intro- und Retrosspektion, Befragung. In: STUDIA LINGUISTICA, S. 127-145.
  20. Lee, J. (2005). New Cognitive Approaches in Process-Oriented Translation Training. Retrieved from http://www.erudit.org/revue/meta/2005/v50/n2/010942ar.pdf
  21. Mir Emadi, E. (2003). A reflection on the university translation program and a solution to the problem. Translation Studies Quarterly No. 2, 53-64.
  22. Mollanazar, H. (2003). Die aktuelle Situation der Übersetzungsausbildung im Iran. Translation Studies Quarterly Nr. 6, 7-26.
  23. Razmjoo, L. (2001). Solutions to improve the translator training program. Translator Quarterly, No. 35, 40-47.
  24. Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings.
  25. Tehrani, M. E. (2003). Shortcomings of translation education in Iran. Translation Studies Quarterly No. 2, 89-94.
  26. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Retrieved from https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/B/bo17239506.html
  27. Vermeer, H. (2014). Skopos-Theorie. Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies.
  28. Weller, F.-R. (1991). Themenheft: Fehler im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Die Neueren Sprachen, 6-90.
  29. Zia Hosseini, M. (2003). Translator training. Translation Studies Quarterly No.2,83-88.
  30. Zimmermann, G. (2007): Das sprachliche Curriculum. In: Bausch, Karl- Richard; Christ, Herbert & Krumm, Hans-Jürgen (Hrsg.): Handbuch Fremdsprachenunterricht. 3. Auflage. Tübingen: Francke, 135–142.
Journal of Foreign Language Research
Volume 14, Issue 4
February 2025
Pages 579-595

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics