A Comparison of the Views of Language Instructors in Iran and Japan on the Implementation of "Grouping" in English Classes

Document Type : research article

Authors

1 English Department, Sabzevar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sabzevar, Iran

2 faculty member

3 English Department, Sabzevar Medical School, Sabzevar, Iran

Abstract

In the present study, possible factors affecting ‘Grouping’ within English language classes were collected drawing on some English language teachers affiliated in Iran and Japan (no.19) and Iranian learners (no.83). The teachers' viewpoints indicated seven factors, including (1) linguistic level (45.16%), (2) age (3.22%), (3) student needs (3.22%), (4) psychological factors (22.58%), (5) number of students in the classroom 12.90%), (6) the number of classroom sessions (3.22%), and (7) random factors (9.67), which showed the tendency of Iranian teachers to focus on product-oriented while Japanese teachers were more preoccupied with process-oriented methodologies in grouping. Students’ viwes involved some six factors including (1) the use of strong partners in each group (45.09%), (2) using homogeneous groups (29.41%), (3) the ability to act with the teacher (knowledge and experience) (3.92%), friendship (15.68%), and 5) friendship with linguistic level (5.88%) which could show their tendency towards improving their linguistic level and not necessarily their social skills through group work. Consequently, based on the evidence obtained in this study, it is recommended that before implementing any new approach – here, teamwork in communicative-style teaching - we should first consider the value system of teaching and learning in the region rather than implementing the related materials. After examining the beliefs of teachers and their students and in particular teachers, then we can align teachers' attitudes with new changes.

Keywords

References

Baloche, L. & Brody, C.M. (2017). Cooperative learning: exploring challenges, crafting innovations, Journal of Education for Teaching, 43:3, 274-283, doi: 10.1080/02607476.2017.1319513.
Berliner, D. C. (2004). Expert teachers: their characteristics, development and accomplishments. In R. Batllori Obiols, A. E Gomez Martinez, M. Oller i Freixa & J. Pages i. Blanch (eds.), De la teoriaa l’aula: Formacio del professorat ensenyament de las ciències socials, pp. 1328. Barcelona, Spain: Departament de Didàctica de la Llengua de la Literatura I de les Ciències Socials, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., Baines, E., & Galton, M. (2003). Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1-2), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00078-8.
Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1994). Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues. Journal of second language writing, 3(1), 17-30.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
Chung, J. (1991). Collaborative learning strategies: The design of instructional environments for the emerging new school. Educational Technology, 31(12), 15-22.
Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom Third Edition. New York: Teachers College Press.‏
Dornyei, Z., & Murphy, T. (2003). Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2015). Content Analysis: Pocket Guides to Social Work Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farrell, T. S., & Jacobs, G. M. (2016). Practicing What We Preach: Teacher Reflection Groups on Cooperative Learning. Tesl-EJ, 19(4), 4, 1-9.
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2007). Cooperative learning. In Active learning: Models from the analytical sciences, ACS Symposium Series, 970, 34-53. doi: 10.1021/bk-2007-0970.ch004.
Friess, R. (2008). Play and narration as patterns of meaning construction: Theoretical foundation and empirical evaluation of the user experience of interactive films. In Joint International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling (pp. 108-113). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Gillies, R. M., Ashman, A. F., & Terwel, J. (2007). The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom: An introduction. The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom, 1.
Gillies, R. M. (2015). Small-Group Work: Developments in Research. In E. T. Emmer & E. J. Sabornie (Eds.), Handbook of Classroom Management (pp. 261-279). New York: Routledge.
Hopkins, E. A. (2008). Work‐related learning: hearing students’ voices. Educational action research, 16(2), 209-219. doi/abs/10.1080/09650790802011858.
Ibrahim, N., Shak, M. S. Y., Mohd, T., Zaidi, A., & Yasin, S. M. A. (2015). The Importance of Implementing Collaborative Learning in the English as a Second Language (ESL) Classroom in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01208-3.
Jafarpour, A. A., Mirzaei, A., & Ehsani, F. Z. (2015). Collaborative L2 Interactivity in Diverse ZPD-Based Proximal Contexts and Interactional Competence Development. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 33(3), 75-100.
Kim, Y. (2012). Implementing ability grouping in EFL contexts: Perceptions of teachers and students. Language Teaching Research, 16(3), 289-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812436894.
Kubota, R. (1999). Japanese culture constructed by discourses: Implications for applied linguistics research and ELT. TESOL quarterly, 33(1), 9-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588189.
Marashi, H., & Baygzadeh, L. (2010). Using cooperative learning to enhance EFL learners’ overall achievement. ‏ Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13 (1), 74-98.
Mardani, M., & Jahanbazian, T. (2014). A Study into the Effects of Competitive Team-Based Learning and ' Learning Together' on the Oral Performance of Intermediate EFL Learners. Research in English Language Teaching, 5(0), 60-73.
Mehrvarz Bahambari, N., & Rahimy, R. (2016). School General English Achievement and Group-Work: An Investigation among Iranian Junior High School Students. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1(1), 43-50.
Memari‌ Hanjani, A., & Li, L. (2017). Cooperative Learning Pedagogy: A Response to an Urgent Need in the Iranian EFLReading Comprehension Context. Teaching Language Skills, 31(36), 33-58.
Rahimi‌ Domakani, M., Mirzaei, A., & Mohammadi, J. (2016). The Effect of Cooperative Learning on Senior High School Students’ EFL Reading Comprehension. Roshd-e- Amozesh-e-Zaban, 119(0), 59-63.
Rogers, C. R. (1957). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge university press.
Sheppard, C., Manalo, E., & Henning, M. (2018). Is ability grouping beneficial or detrimental to Japanese ESP students' English language proficiency development?. English for Specific Purposes, 49, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.10.002.
Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research of cooperative learning. Educational leadership, 48(5), 71-82.
 
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Sugie, S. (1995). Cooperative learning in Japan. International Journal of Educational Research, 23(3), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(95)93609-Y.
Suzuki, K. (1948). Shusengo no kyoiku ni kansuru jitsujochosa (Actual situation about post-war education]. Jtdo Shinri, 2, 52-58.
Tanaka, T. (2009). Communicative language teaching and its cultural appropriateness in Japan. Doshisha Studies in English, 84, 107-123.
Treko, N. (2013). The big challenge: Teaching large multi-level classes. Academic journal of interdisciplinary studies, 2(4), 243-251.‏ doi/10.5901/ajis.2012.v2n4p243.
 
Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small group research, 37(5), 490-521.
doi/abs/10.1177/1046496406292938.
Zamani, M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping of Iranian EFL learners in a writing context. Cogent Education, 3(1), doi/pdf/10.1080/2331186X.2016.114995.
Journal of Foreign Language Research
Volume 10, Issue 1
April 2020
Pages 233-259

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics