Strategic Planning and Accuracy and Fluency in Second Language Acquisition

Document Type : research article

Authors

University of Tehran

Abstract

This study set out to investigate the differential effects of unguided strategic planning on the accuracy and fluency of low-, mid-, and high-proficiency learners’ oral production. Sixty participants were assigned to two equal groups of low- and mid-proficiency. Thirty English major graduate students of the University of Tehran, Iran, were also assigned to a high-proficiency group. The participants within each proficiency group were divided into two groups of unguided strategic planning (USP) and no planning (NP), and their oral productions of a narrative picture story task were audio-recorded, transcribed, segmented, coded, and scored for measures of accuracy and fluency. The results of a set of t-tests revealed that the mid-proficiency participants benefited most from strategic planning, as both the accuracy and fluency of their oral production improved. Low-proficiency participants, in contrast, showed no sign of improved accuracy or fluency under the SP condition. High-proficiency participants also demonstrated higher fluency after the strategic planning opportunity. The findings of the study are discussed within the wider framework of Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT).

Keywords

References

منابع
  Ahmadian, M. J. (2012). The effects of guided careful online planning on complexity, accuracy and fluency in intermediate EFL learners’ oral production: The case of English articles. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 129–149.
Brown, H. D. (2005). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bygate, M. (1999). Quality of language and purpose of task: Patterns of learners' language on two oral communication tasks. Language Teaching Research, 3, 185–214.
Bygate, M. 2001. ‘Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language’ in M. Bygate, P. Skehan, and M. Swain (eds): Researching Pedagogic Tasks, Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing. Longman.
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing. London: Longman.
Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367-383. 
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language   acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (1987). Second language acquisition in context. New York: Prentice Hall.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Eds.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3-34). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in l2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30 (4), 474–509.
Foster, P. 1996. ‘Doing the task better: How planning time influences students’ performance’ in J. Willis and D. Willis (eds): Challenge and Change in Language Teaching. Heinemann.
Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–324.
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: a unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics 21(3), 354-375.
Fowler S. W. & Norman C. (1987). Nelson Quickcheck Placement Tests. Nelson.
Halliday, M. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.
Heaton, J. (1975). Beginning composition through pictures. Harlow: Longman.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Kawauchi, C. (2005). The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of learners with low and high intermediate proficiency. In R. Ellis (Eds.): Planning and Task-Performance in a Second Language. John Benjamins.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Levelt, W. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. The MIT Press.
Marefat, H. & Rahmany, R. (2009). Acquisition of English relative clauses by Persian EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 5(2). 21-48.  
Mochizuki, N. & Ortega, L. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginning-level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization, Language Teaching Research, 12, 11–37.
McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
Nakakubo, T. (2011). The effects of planning on second language oral performance in Japanese: processes and production. Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 2011. http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/1038.
Nemati, M., Dorri, J. & Vahdani, R. (2009). Feedback diversity on students' written assignments: a local investigation of Persian speakers.  The Journal of Modern Thoughts in Education. 4(4), 165-182.
Noroozi, M. (2010). Strategic planning focus and time in narrative writing. Unpublished M.A. Thesis. University of Mazandaran.
Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–48.
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA: SLA and cognitive science. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.). The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631-678). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Rutherford, K. (2001). An Investigation of the Effects of Planning on Oral Production in a Second Language. Unpublished MA Thesis, University of Auckland.
Sangarun, J. (2001). The effects of pre-task planning on foreign language performance. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto, Canada. 
Scarborough, H. (1989). Index of productive syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics 11, 1-22.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings, Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson. (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-483). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
Wagner, K. R. (1985). How much do children say in a day? Journal of Child Language 12, 475-87.
Wendel, J. (1997). Planning and Second Language Narrative Production. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Temple University, Japan.
Widdowson, H. (1998). The theory and practice of critical discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 1, 136-151.
Wigglesworth, G. (1997). An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse, Language Testing, 14(1), 21–44.
Yuan, F. & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production.  Applied Linguistics 24, 1–27.
Journal of Foreign Language Research
Volume 4, Issue 2
July 2017
Pages 191-214

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics